Welcome to Blogster!
1,488,205 Blogster Users  |  364,642 Posts
 
 
 

tjdonegan

 

Blog Traffic: 21259

Posts: 298

My Comments: 1179

User Comments: 1948

Photos: 3

Friends: 6

Following: 0

Followers: 4

Points: 5692

Last Online: 20 hours ago


 
 

Visitors

No Recent Visitors
 

Video phone call of fake ballots being ordered from China...

Added: Saturday, November 28th 2020 at 3:40pm by tjdonegan
 
 
 

If one goes to Liberty Daily the link is there and it functions! If one goes to Liberty Daily and selects/clicks on: "Revealed: Video relashed of Phone Call recording to Chinese Manufacturer Requesting a Bulk Order of Fake US 2020 Ballots" If one clicks that link, it is the 3rd software interface down the page. The second down the page is not translated into English... Liberty Daily is where to go, the video is roghly 66 seconds long...

tjd

www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/11/revealed-video-released-phone-call-recording-chinese-manufacturer-requesting-bulk-order-fake-us-2020-ballots

 

User Comments

It doesn't work, but if you copy and paste the link in google search engine she does...?

tjd

Just leave off the https:// and it works too. 

The adio/videos on that link won't play for me.

Give it a rest. The orange man lost. It's bad enough we have to put up with his disdain for democracy and his petty, man child bullshit rants that fly from his fingertips constantly while he pouts, golfing his days away. But having to put up with his obedient, fawning, fanatical zealot fan base is just about enough to make a man puke.

Remember when you all were whining and crying about how the evil, black, America hating Muslim wasn't going to leave office? How he was a wannabe dictator? An authoritarian strongman. And now you're all legitimately praising one. Shame on you all.  

Hi, Anonymous!

Normally, I would respond to your puerile comments one after the other so as to attempt edify, but it is obvious that words only possess subjective meaning for you... It is likely that not a single Trump supporter desires him to do anything but hand the baton to Biden, if they know Biden won; as it is - and please offer an explanation as to how - for example - as ballot dump happens after hours (i.e., during the time the precincts shut down for the night) of 570000 ballots containing only about 3000 ballots for POTUS Trump...? That mathematical near-improbability, and many others, lead a fair-minded individual to question whether things were above-board, or rigged... And - by the way - nobody expects you to actually be able to address my question, because not a single fair-minded individual understand Leftists as capable being concerned with justice and the rule-of-law; you anonymous, and millions like you, may be 'nice' people - if known personally, but dispositionally wicked... I'm sorry to write that, but such is the case; I wish it were not so, but...

Cordially, tjd

Hi again, Anonymous!

Sorry, but I should have written that you are inveterately wicked, rather than dispositionally wicked...

Cordially, tjd

"Sorry, but I should have written that you are inveterately wicked, rather than dispositionally wicked."

Oh, I don't really care about your "puerile" rebuttals, so stuff a sock in it.

So here's the thing. Trump and his attorneys have lost over 30 lawsuits now. They keep coming to court without evidence of fraud. They talk big on Twitter and in front of the cameras, but when it comes time to put their money where their mouth is, there's nothing, nada, zilch, zip. Now, the other day Trump said that "Biden can only enter the White House as President if he can prove that his ridiculous "80,000,000 votes" were not fraudulently or illegally obtained." ( There's your puerile horseshit, right there.) But you see, it's not Biden's job to prove Trump's baseless allegations. The burden of proof lies at the foot of Trump, and so far he's produced fuck-all. Trump's gone so far as to push certain Republicans in charge of certifying the election to refuse to certify, and he's even pushed to install loyal electors in swing states with Republican-led legislatures. These are the tactics of a want to be strongman. So like it or not, if you support this weasel of a man, this grifter, this con man, this shit stain on the liberal democracy we call America, you've made a deal with the devil, you've sided with a wannabe authoritarian asshat. You've proven that you are more concerned with ideology than democracy.

"nobody expects you to actually be able to address my question, because not a single fair-minded individual understand Leftists as capable being concerned with justice and the rule-of-law"

Well aren't you a petty little man. "LEFTISTS ARE DUMB!" Good one. I'm well and deservedly put in my place.

"Biden can only enter the White House as President if he can prove that his ridiculous "80,000,000 votes" were not fraudulently or illegally obtained." ( There's your puerile horseshit, right there.)

Leftists rely on puerile (and worse) bullshit routinely. You're going all "Trump is literally Hitler" again.

Calling Trump an authoritarian at a time when the left has gone completely totalitarian is quite funny. Beijing Biden is backed by billionaires, multinational corporations including Big Tech, Hollywood and media, academia, mainstream Media, Wall St and the Banks. Under the guise of social and economic justice, they've used cancerous identity politics and other sick tactics to achieve their goals.

Petty tyrants and useful idiots are doing their bidding all over the world as we speak and you're talking about Trump the authoritarian?

{#rofl.gif}   Worst authoritarian ever....

The typical leftist is so far gone that not only do you not understand who the authoritarians are, you've enabled them to become totalitarian.


https://i.giphy.com/media/Y4qEWssdARY3Sv9s88/200.webp

Bla, bla bla. So much noise from these blind followers of the church of Trump. So much projection. So much of the same redundant bullshit. I've heard all this before. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEZFyq_Cd4s

P.S. Hi, Metal. You're so predictable and repetitive it's a little like suffering an annoying earworm of some muzak version of Nickelback's, Rockstar. Just tiresome.

Hi. You meant to say consistent and honest. A level you've never achieved here in the boomer ghetto. Step it up!

Hahah funny stuff there...  as if Nickelback in any form isn't the very definition of muzak - synthetic, like your personality.

Hi, Anonymous!

I interposed my responses between your comments. Your comments - to include my comments quoted by you are in italics, and darkened...


So here's the thing. Trump and his attorneys have lost over 30 lawsuits now. They keep coming to court without evidence of fraud.

 

Actually anonymous, the Courts are not allowing the evidence to be heard because they are denying POTUS Trump’s legal team, and POTUS Trump, standing before the Court… What the Courts are asserting – by their denial of standing – is that the interested Party/Parties before the Courts – are the citizens of the particular State in question. Under such rubrics, one may possess mathematical certainty of fraud, but be unable to have the evidence viewed… Courts have discretion regarding such matters, and – generally – Courts favor the causes and interests of the Democrat Party and the social-political Left, and they do so because the culture reflects the University which is axiomatically social-political Left i.e., objective-reality is a priori viewed as dubious/absurd… So, Anonymous, it is not that they haven’t brought evidence to Court; it is that they are not allowed to present the evidence… If the Press was objective (interested in reporting facts rather than editorializing i.e., dismissing facts which cast doubt upon their preconceived narrative…) - rather than ordered to the social-political Left…

 

They talk big on Twitter and in front of the cameras, but when it comes time to put their money where their mouth is, there's nothing, nada, zilch, zip. Now, the other day Trump said that "Biden can only enter the White House as President if he can prove that his ridiculous "80,000,000 votes" were not fraudulently or illegally obtained." ( There's your puerile horseshit, right there.)  

 

So I’ve answered this, but you are entitled to reject my answer because it is too lucid for you… If you actually were just – as I’ve said previously – you would find the treatment of the 2020 election - by the Press – unsettling; you would observe that the Press takes a side, not only in the 2020 election, but consistently on every issue. If you ‘think’ (i.e., feel – it is obvious your ‘thought’ is reduced to your sentiments…) otherwise, such is why I claim that you are inveterately wicked; POTUS Trump and his presidency has been ubiquitously opposed by everyone but those that voted for him; the dichotomy which exists between Trump supporters, and opponents is grounded in two dichotomist orthodoxies, viz: Trump supporters have views akin to the Founders which are consonant with the U.S. Constitution and the rule-of-law; Trump’s opponents are – generally – inveterately egoistical nihilists amenable to despotism because – for those such as they – have a conception of ‘liberty’ flattened to 4-space, or materialism (i.e., the quantifiable). Because such is their conscious, or unconscious, view/s they are singularly concerned with their selves, and with the moment. The rule-of-law, and its proponents, tend to unsettle egoists, because they oppose abortion, and generally seek wholesome culture… And, anonymous, it is very likely that if Joe Biden were to assert that he – and his acolytes (Democrats, bureaucratic operatives and sundry others…) – have stolen the election, privately to you; your views would not be altered an iota!

 

But you see, it's not Biden's job to prove Trump's baseless allegations. The burden of proof lies at the foot of Trump, and so far he's produced fuck-all. Trump's gone so far as to push certain Republicans in charge of certifying the election to refuse to certify, and he's even pushed to install loyal electors in swing states with Republican-led legislatures. These are the tactics of a want to be strongman. So like it or not, if you support this weasel of a man, this grifter, this con man, this shit stain on the liberal democracy we call America, you've made a deal with the devil, you've sided with a wannabe authoritarian asshat. You've proven that you are more concerned with ideology than democracy.

POTUS Trump is not a ‘strongman’ nor does he employ the tactics of a strongman (he simply unsettles women - those objecting to their nature, and effeminate men; both which may be locate along the continuum of egoism; each soul is dynamic and on-the-road towards dystopia since they are unmoored...), although he is incessantly characterized as such; such eristical practice dates back to Calicles; Calicles was instrumental in bringing about Socrates death… But, you – as most of the social-political Left – are adept at mischaracterizations… 

 


"nobody expects you to actually be able to address my question, because not a single fair-minded individual understand Leftists as capable being concerned with justice and the rule-of-law"

Well aren't you a petty little man. "LEFTISTS ARE DUMB!" Good one. I'm well and deservedly put in my place.
 

 

The comment regarding Leftists vis-à-vis justice and the rule-of-law was not asserting that “leftists are dumb!” it was asserting that Leftists weltanschauung (as I indicated above, such a view is materialistic/nihilistic; this follows as corollary of the conscious, or unconscious, denial of objective reality…) renders them incapable of reflecting, or considering, justice in the abstract i.e., objectively. Leftists – as children-of-Calicles – inveterately practice pre-Socratic justice i.e., helping one’s friends, and harming one’s enemies… It is because your soul is so ordered that your understanding/concern of objective truth/morality is to be likened to an individual – who has lost the ability to smell – being concerned with the aroma of his fiancés perfume (in the latter instance scents are all alike i.e., scentless, in the former objective right-and-wrong is incomprehensible/meaningless)… As consequence, Leftists are ‘blind’ to what is just, and are thus, not only unamenable to sustaining rule-of-law, their dispositions are inimical to it and to justice…

Cordially, tjd

Actually anonymous, the Courts are not allowing the evidence to be heard because they are denying POTUS Trump’s legal team, and POTUS Trump, standing before the Court

 

 

 

Yeah, that's just not true. But go ahead and believe what you will.

 

one may possess mathematical certainty of fraud, but be unable to have the evidence viewed

 

Ah, no. Or rather, no one possesses mathematical certainty of wide spread voter fraud. They've had ample opportunity to present their case, but have been unable to bring forth even reliable circumstantial evidence.

 

and – generally – Courts favor the causes and interests of the Democrat Party and the social-political Left


This is just getting sad. Why do I even bother? This is just a ridiculous, unfounded argument. Can't prove your point, blame it on the leftists. Can you say," persecution complex"? What I'm hearing is that justice leans left because of a level of intellectual pursuit necessary for the station (at least in a formal court of law). And this is based on your opinion (and the charge of many conservatives) that universities are bastions of liberal indoctrination. But wait, you certainly talk like a learned man. I'd bet dollars to donuts that you attended university. Yet you seem to think the  learned are undoubtedly leftists. Curiouser and curiouser.


So, Anonymous, it is not that they haven’t brought evidence to Court; it is that they are not allowed to present the evidence

 

So once again, NO. That's all baseless excuses.

 

you would find the treatment of the 2020 election - by the Press – unsettling; you would observe that the Press takes a side, not only in the 2020 election, but consistently on every issue.

 

Which press would you be talking about? The press you agree with, or the press you don't? I agree the the press has become a shit-show ( You can blame that, in large part, on Reagan by the way.) but both sides have plenty of propaganda outlets. And while we're discussing it, there is no left-wing, mainstream media in America, regardless of what you might think, or how you feel about the subject.

 

POTUS Trump is not a ‘strongman’

 

You're right. He's a wannabe strongman.  In reality he's a whiny little bitch.

 

renders them incapable of reflecting, or considering, justice in the abstract

 

i.e. Leftists are dumb. Being unable to think in the abstract would be a serious impediment on a human being. No? Oh yes, I see you go on to say just that, in your own pretentious way.

Hi, Anonymous!

Your reply seems to argue: "I don't agree with you Donegan!!!!!" Such a forceful argument...{#basic-cool.gif}  

Cordially, tjd

 

My argument is that your opinion isn't based in fact. It's just your opinion. Y'all are grasping at straws, baseless conspiracy theories, biases, prejudices and political blind spots. Including the example in the OP. Including such things as MsPurrrrfect's post about a raid of a CIA facility in Frankfurt (or rather a raid of Scytl servers in Frankfurt) which never happened. Scytl doesn't even have servers in Frankfurt. Including your (and Trumps') allegations of prejudice judges (at least one of these judges having been appointed by Trump) who won't even allow evidence to be admitted. These things just aren't based in reality. It's all bullshit and misinformation.

You line up all these bullshit allegations and malignant misinformation, sprinkle on a healthy dose of right-wing talking points and and voilà, you've got yourself the current state of the typical American conservative. At least the vehemently pro Trumpers, thankfully not all have lost their heads over orange man.

Have you ever stopped to think that maybe this isn't some world wide conspiracy against Trump, and that maybe Trump is just a megalomaniac with the ravings of a lunatic man-child, and maybe that's why he was only able to secure a single term in office?

Hi, anonymous!

Yes! All those things are considered! I do not believe in conspiracies, I think they are funny! Conspiracies presuppose right action and those which attempt to thwart the realization of the good. When a people become lawless (immorality is a reflex, but only because they - to their very core have come to believe that there no such thing as right-and-wrong...), they act to advance their individual interests by any means available to themselves, and a culture of such people move in a wicked harmony, each 'understanding' the utility in advancing others promoting lawlessness, each working to promote a rule-of-might to replace the cumbersome rule-of-law... Ideas/beliefs circumscribe conduct; if one only believes in power and such a belief becomes ubiquitous, it produces an organic 'army' of like-minded individuals each inveterately working towards the same goal, but as individuals... Such conditions may look conspiratorial, but actually it is something like a confederacy-of-wickedness... Because the individuals are individual believers, it is much more difficault to deal with than a conspiracy...

Cordially, tjd 

With that comment it looks like you can't see the forest for the trees TJ.

It's no wonder why you're always understating things.

Good news for you TJ is that you'll never be censored. Because none of this matters....

Hi, anonymous!

 

When I was @ Bestthinking.com I was banned a number of times, at least 4 times, but it may have been 7 times…

Conspiracies look very much like what I describe, but conspiracies – those that actually exist… I should clarify – It is not accurate to say that I don't believe conspiracies exist and have occurred; it is that I do not believe conspiracies can be successful; it requires secrecy among all of the players, and as the players are multiplied the risk of exposure is as well... Clinton was able to the things he did, as Obama, because the culture allows the wicked to ascend to power; many on the social-political Right (and I mean across all socio-economic brackets) and Left helped those wicked individuals remain in power…

The culture is amenable to wickedness (i.e., it reflexively opposed the good i.e., reality as God intended i.e., rational existence…), and has been for years, and years…  When a culture is turned against the truth i.e., when it has become irrational, those that remain rational appear to be the 'conspirators' - or conspiratorial – generally because they cannot make an argument, or explain, what they (in their impatience and frustration) see in a way that may be understood by those that do not see… Conspiracies – once exposed – cannot be sustained, if the wide-culture seeks what has been historically been understood as human telos i.e., beatitude i.e., accord with God which is to say objective truth…

What I describe – which is not a conspiracy, but has been characterized as such - is both ubiquitous and organic and is nearly impossible to prevent/halt (because the animating ideas are both insidious and ubiquitously distributed; these ideas are much like "maple-syrup" it gets on everything which is touched...); even those that think/believe themselves to be of/on the social-political Right are infected with insidious ideas which render them agents of the social-political Left; yet most are completely oblivious of such...

My practice (habit) for 'understatement' is likely seen as understatement, but it is actually the circumspection of understanding how each human soul is animated by a myriad of conflicting impetuses, and that those which ascribe a simple moniker e.g. liberal, sexist, socialist, fascist, conservative, racist, et al are expressing their feelings for those with which they vehemently emotionally disagree, more so than describing those which they characterize i.e., their characterization is 'knee-jerk' and culturally convenient/apropos, but - generally - not descriptive... Understatement…? I attempt to justly describe - those people and their animating ideas (as they explicitly, and/or implicitly reveal them) and draw the necessary, and/or probable, inferences upon that and those which I comment...

Chastising those with which I disagree does not plant any seeds of thought which may not come to fruition for years; rather, it - generally - only confirms them in their view/s while intimating I’m only arguing raw-sentiment… The social-political Right acquired the bad habit of characterizing those on the Left as “liberals” (my guess is from William F. Buckley jr.) rather than doggedly attempting to engage the Leftist, and others in dialectical discourse… I liked Buckley, but clearly think his contributions to public-discourse are dramatically overstated; for all of the encomiums ascribe to Buckley, often his manner was inimical to dialogue…So my 'understatement/s' are often responses to derogation - in which I generally do not repay insults with insults - and this is because I’m more interested in turning another towards ‘the-light’ than besting them in an exchange of insults… Moreover, if others are reading, they too may be given 'food-for-thought' which may bare fruit dow-the-road...

Cordially, tjd    

To turn people to the light, you must be turned towards people capable of turning to the light.

If you understood how the Internet works it would help. Right now there are places exploding which are not being censored. If you were sharing your links there and hosting here, you'd have a 1000% better chance at enlightening someone.

Your opinions of how to interact with people are your business. I don't care one bit. I haven't insulted a person yet since being censored from Blogster. Wonder how that could be? I know what I know, and I won't be insulted by a bunch of fuckin' Blogsters who haven't even entered the 21st century.

TRUMP: The authoritarian POTUS who spent 4 years getting fucked by the CIA.

{#rofl.gif}

 

Authoritarians who actually controlled the state and did horrific things, unlike orange man.

https://i2.wp.com/debatingreligion.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/hitler-stalin-mao.jpg?resize=995%2C400&ssl=1

Learn the difference.

Perhaps you accidentally skipped over parts of my agument, perhaps it was done purposely. I deliberately used the word wannabe, I used it because Trumps is a feckless turd. So your oh so clever rebuttal is to drag out three of the worst tyrants in modern history. You're aware that the world has seen a good number of authoritarian leaders that didn't murder huge numbers of their own countrymen, right? Perhaps it's you that needs to learn just what authoritarian means.

 

Your extreme, hyperbolic arguments are weak, and silly, Metal. Talk about useful idiots, or mayby in your case we could say,  useless idiot. seeing as how your little more than a bag of wind.

LOL

2016: Literally Hitler
2020: Wannabe Authoritarian

We both know you're not focused enough to debate me on authoritarianism. Please....

Besides, I'm sure I'm gonna be blocked soon enough...  you've had years to win arguments and never did.

"We both know you're not focused enough to debate me on authoritarianism. Please."

If you're going to use it in the way you've demonstrated here, I'm not at all sure you fully grasp the concept. So I'm not too worried.

"Besides, I'm sure I'm gonna be blocked soon enough...  you've had years to win arguments and never did."

Shit, if you think you always win arguments then you're delusional. What the hell am I thinking, of course you're delusional, we all know that. But like I've said, not too worried about being schooled by the likes of you.

Hi TJ. Metalheart here. Blogster commies banned me because they could not beat me.

You should leave your posts here publicly open... but share your links on Parler and MeWe. There is a Newsmax Chat and Group that are both excellent. I only went there because of your suggestion. I like the flow of information.

But stop wasting your time with these midwits and censor lovers. If you share links to these posts, people will read them. I guarantee it.

Peace bro!

Metalheart, I tried to sign up on Parlor but it would keep locking up on the last step. I'll have to give it another try.

I've heard of others having problems too. Not sure what's up but it's probably due to the stress the site is under. I read yesterday where both Parler and MeWe reached 10 million users. I've noticed some glitches during this surge.

Hope you can get in there Nate. Look me up @maxliberty if you do :)

With the exodus from FOX, I can see why alternative sites would be flooded with newbies.

They had massive growth since the purge in 2018... and even more now with Fox News decline, and Newsmax's rise. Already 26k in the Newsmax group.

The chat rooms on MeWe move at the speed of the game right now. They're just exploding with information.

The groups and chats are where I'll die online.

It looks like Parler is the Twitter alternative, and MeWe is the FB alt..

Works for me until they censor. I'm no longer in the business of caring. I just wanna know wtf is going on for my own decision making.

Post A Comment