Welcome to Blogster!
1,488,570 Blogster Users  |  364,642 Posts



Blog Traffic: 58110

Posts: 562

My Comments: 1875

User Comments: 3716

Photos: 5

Friends: 6

Following: 0

Followers: 4

Points: 10400

Last Online: 8 hours ago



No Recent Visitors

Sex-education and/or abstinance - a response to Troll.

Added: Monday, March 20th 2023 at 6:30pm by tjdonegan

Hi, Troll!

Until Alfred Kinsey published his Kinsey Reports1 (1948 regarding men & 1953 regarding women; gotta wonder why he didn’t think to document the LGBQT etc…?) sex education was in demand nearly nowhere other than among social-behaviorists and avant-garde’s hedonists e.g., Hugh Hefner; the average married couple remained married for life (of course people had extra-marital affairs, but nowhere near as many as Hollywood wood lead people to believe; most people’s lives were dominated by work and family responsibilities and Judeo-Christian Church’s were hubs of community activity; pornographic material was difficult to obtain, and to be caught with such material would have been an embarrassment…). Believe it or not, the average girl and average guy, graduated high-school virginal; Kinsey’s work provided a “scientific” impetusforthesexual-revolution and for those that would like to ubiquitously distribute pornographic material and instigate sex-education in the public school2.

1 These are Kinsey’s nonscientific - read fraudulent (Kinsey’s “studies” had much more to do with the perverse sexual habits and practices of the incarcerated than the common Joe’s and Josephine’s – cultural fillips i.e., Kinsey and many avant-gardes) reports which became – until the sociologist Judith Riesman (1987) asked a number of key questions at a International Conference of Behavioral Scientists gather in Philadelphia, Pa.; there it was revealed – besides the fact that Kinsey claimed prisoners behavior represented married couples behavior – it was revealed that Kinsey and Company were masturbating infants; those action were felony actions!

2 Some would understand this push for advancing the sexual revolution as fulfilling a number of the 45 Declared Communist takeover Goals (published in 1963); viz: 25) Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV 26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy." 27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a "religious crutch." 28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state." 32. Support anysocialistmovementto give centralized control over any part of the culture-- education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc. 40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce. 41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents. 

Now when one has been removed from an approximate moral society (A completely moral society is not possible in all practicality, because humans are fallible beings i.e., we are all sinners i.e., at times, and under certain conditions, place desire over the things that they know they ought to do, and/or avoid doing…) one may – after a time – remember the innocence that permeated much of the population, and those too young to remember, or too young to have experience the remnant culture of Christendom, may believe the fabled tales of the behavioral “scientists,” but fables and tales are just what they are. Sure, perversity has always been a part of human activity, but such activity has through much of the history of the last 2000+ years been predominantly on the margins of society. And our point –Troll – regarding “sexual-education and abstinence” is simply that if the society of the United States to escape its downward spiraltowardanautocratic despotic Governed dystopian society, it must de-centralize – in every aspect of society. Thus, repealing the 17th Amendment, “ending the Fed” (i.e., fractional reserve banking system) – as Ron Paul has advocated for roughly 50 years (Alternately repealing the Bull-Moose Platform), and derivatively end Federal de-funding of the Universities, and defunding “scientific” research vis-à-vis the behavioral disciplines that have been utilized by politicians to manipulate the citizenry… Following this de-centralizing will appear an gradual organic societal shift back toward traditional social-arrangements i.e., traditional families, and – likely – the reinvigoration Judeo-Christian social-mores…

Thomas J. Donegan





User Comments

" but fables and tales are just what they are." juwt as many writings in the bible are!

Hi, Martin!

Difference: Bible teaches moral lessons (social cohesive lessions...); behavior sciences teach immoral - read anti-social behavioral lessions (social-divisive lessons in preparation for an autocratic State; by design or otherwise...)!

Cordially, tjd

Yes, FACTS are always wrong!  LOL

Hi, Martin!

To which facts do you refer, Martin? Once one a priori deposes objective reality - in the hands of the resultant übermenschean - lies/falsehoods become truths, and truths become lies/falsehoods.

Modern science - if it consistently applied its method, it would nullify modern science. The method/s of the empirical & behavioral sciences is philosophical i.e., non-scientific! Those same scientific disciplines that bracket (i.e., hold non-quantifiable knowledge disciplines as lacking objectivity i.e., quantitative value, and thus omitted from considerations regarding "courses of action" e.g., discussion regarding appropriating public monies) non-scientific knowledge disciplines. If those sciences - with logical consistency - subjected their non-scientific criteria and methods to the criteria and methods of their disciplines, they would acknowledge the inherent contradiction vis-à-vis the presuppositions of their disciplines i.e., the predicate of their disciplines are non-scientific and should - too - be bracketed. This would result in these sciences falling silent, rather than relying upon public ignorance - as to what "science" is and what limitations inescapably attend modern science disciplines. It is because of this ubiquitous ignorance regarding the nature of what is "science" that Fauci and Company - along with the international State Press - and the Governments of the globe - were able to all the wickedly manipulative coercive things that they did regarding COVID-19, where a global "bee-sting" was treated as the bubonic-plague, a disease that killed 2 out of 3 people... 

In many areas/fields of what constitute knowledge disciplines the general populace - even when reasonably, and often well, educated - lacks the subtle understanding that attends so many knowledge disciplines; politicians - particularly social-political Leftist politicians because the State-Press almost never hold them to an account - rely upon people [experts in a particular discipline e.g., economics] that understand the subtleties to inform these politicians on how best to manipulate the populace, getting the common Joe's and Josephine's to desire things that are actually harmful to the typical "Joe" and "Josephine". Apart from your affinity for things social-political Left - because you are homosexual - I'm willing to bet that your sympathies align social-political Left largely because of your lack of understanding regarding many things. In that - Martin - we induce, that you have many, many kinsmen! And - by-the-bye - many on the social-political Right are in that same camp, but their affinities draw them to what appears to be conservative/moral and/or the lesser-of-two-evils.

Take care, Martin!

Cordially, tjd

Kinsey was one sick fuck. The Institute in his name at Indiana University should be demolished. My family hated him for 100 years.

Blogster has reached cult status. People don't care one bit about the truth.



Hi, Scott!

Once I worked with a big outdoorsman i.e., hunter, fisher, trapper, hiker, et al and I asked him how he could think of supporting those that want to give mora and more power to regulatory agencies e.g., the EPA. His response was: "I don't understand the issues; I just think of what would be worse if true'. This is why he voted for Obama, and voted consitently for people that were opposed to things he loved to do (Same thing - for him - with the 2nd Amendment)...

Cordially, tjd

The best thing to do for someone who doesn't understand the issues is to get informed on the issues, or don't vote and screw the rest of us. 


I agree with you, Scott, but the guy didn't want to be informed. He trusted the Press and the culture; he would get upset with things I'd say, and make the company aware of me addressing social-political issues... Why I mention this individual, is he himself was an incongruity; voting for those that would - if they could - eliminate 2nd Amendment rights, while abolishing most of the activities he enjoyed. He wasn't a Lefty, he was a ninny; I think we are swimming in them...

Cordially, tjd

Post A Comment