Welcome to Blogster!
487,076 Blogster Users  |  364,642 Posts
 
 
 

RaggedyAnn

 

Blog Traffic: 59366

Posts: 244

My Comments: 2103

User Comments: 3933

Photos: 612

Friends: 35

Following: 0

Followers: 22

Points: 8072

Last Online: 14 hours ago


 
 

Visitors

nobullthinker retiredinaz mewoldmanontheblock intrudermarine feralpuppies Kat-Al AJay70 FloridaLady sanogoshahini
 

Buchanan to Obama.........

Added: Sunday, February 5th 2012 at 8:17am by RaggedyAnn
Related Tags: opinion
 
 
 
   
Subject:The White Side of the Story of Negros ... this is a good read
 Priority:NormalDate:Saturday, February 4, 2012 1:43 PMSize:10 KB
BUCHANAN TO OBAMA

Finally............ It is Said Publicly. I have never seen the white side explained better! Pat Buchanan had the guts to say it. It is about time.

BUCHANAN TO OBAMA
cid:740A084891DA4B6C81FC8142DE38C5ED@BERNIEBy Patrick J. Buchanan

Barack says we need to have a conversation about race in America . Fair enough. But this time, it has to be a two-way conversation. White America needs to be heard from, not just lectured to.... This time, the Silent Majority needs to have its convictions, grievances and demands heard. And among them are these:

First, America has been the best country on earth for black folks. It was here that 600,000 black people, brought from Africa in slave ships, grew into a community of 40 million, were introduced to Christian salvation, and reached the greatest levels of freedom and prosperity blacks have ever known.. Wright ought to go down on his knees and thank God he is an American.

Second, no people anywhere has done more to lift up blacks than white Americans. Untold trillions have been spent since the ' 60s on welfare, food stamps, rent supplements, Section 8 housing, Pell grants, student loans, legal services, Medicaid, Earned Income Tax Credits and poverty programs designed to bring the African-American community into the mainstream. Governments, businesses and colleges have engaged in discrimination against white folks -- with affirmative action, contract set-asides and quotas -- to advance black applicants over white applicants. Churches, foundations, civic groups, schools and individuals all over America have donated their time and money to support soup kitchens, adult education, day care, retirement and nursing homes for blacks.
We hear the grievances. Where is the gratitude??

Barack talks about new 'ladders of opportunity' for blacks. Let him go to Altoona ? And Johnstown, and ask the white kids in Catholic schools how many were visited lately by Ivy League recruiters handing out scholarships for 'deserving' white kids...? Is white America really responsible for the fact that the crime and incarceration rates for African-Americans are seven times those of white America ? Is it really white America 's fault that illegitimacy in the African-American community has hit 70 percent and the black dropout rate from high schools in some cities has reached 50 percent?

Is that the fault of white America or, first and foremost, a failure of the black community itself?
As for racism, its ugliest manifestation is in interracial crime, and especially interracial crimes of violence.

Is Barack Obama aware that while white criminals choose black victims 3 percent of the time, black criminals choose white victims 45 percent of the time?
Is Barack aware that black-on-white rapes are 100 times more common than the reverse, that black-on-white robberies were 139 times as common in the first three years of this decade as the reverse?
We have all heard ad nauseam from the Rev. Al Charleton, about Tawana Brawley, the Duke rape case and Jena . And all turned out to be hoaxes. But about the epidemic of black assaults on whites that are real, we hear nothing.
Sorry, Barack, some of us have heard it all before, about 40 years and 40 trillion tax dollars ago. This needs to be passed around because, this is a message everyone needs to hear!!!


Because I'm for a better America

I am Not racist, Not violent, Just not silent anymore.



Forward this.

User Comments

This is a good article and it needed to be said. Thanks.  I sent it out.

Loved it!

Sadly your facts are wrong, your analogy is bordering on racist theory and you need a history lesson badly...

1680-1786--there were 2,130,000 slaves imported for the english colonies in American....38.6% died enroute.

1776-1800 average yearly 74,000 slaves imported total of 1,850,000...almost half died.

The civil war ended in 1865 and the 13th amendment freed african americans but they were not able to vote for another 100 years. Do some checking and you will see how the housing market, job market were anti-black until the 1960's.

Your black on white rape is faulty and based on davidduke.com type numbers. Justice department statistics strongly contradictyour findings. Along with that 75 to 90% of rapes are not reported.

Out of 413 serial killers profiled from 1945-2004, 323 were white.

According to DOJ Statistics 7 out of 10crimes against children/sexual were committed by white males....

And please...CHRISTIANITY....It was white southern christians that burned down black churches and lynched black boys and men...

And reality. my daughter is as white as snow. Due to her high Psat scores and 98% honors average she has received 22 letters from colleges around the country...It is all about work and effort, not skin color....

You are right

The facts are solid. Blacks were brought into America to use as slave labor by Americans. Before we gained our independence Americans were British subjects. After independence, same people/different title. And symantics does not excuse ignorance. Lincoln emancipated the slaves. He did not give them equal rights. Equal rights did not come into effect until the 1960's under a democratic President. It was Johnson, a democrat that led the March on Civil rights and equality. (NOT THE REPUBLITARDS)...The problem with people who think like you is you think twisting words will make it look like America was squeaky clean during the genocide of black slaves as they were when they wiped out most of the true Americans with the genocide against Native Americans.

You are wrong.

Bob,

What I don't understand about you Bob is why you persist displaying your gross ignorance of US History. Do some much needed research, and I have provided you with credible links to that effect.

Furthmore, I REMEMBER these FACTS.

The myth of Republican racism:

http://suwanneegop.com/NBRA%20Civil%20Rights%20Newsletter-2.pdf

THE KKK FORMED BY FORMER DEMOCRATS WHO OPPOSED EQUALITY FOR BLACKS http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95aQshvaAII The Democratic Party’s Legacy of Racism
Editorial
December 2002

by: Mackubin T. Owens

http://www.ashbrook.org/publicat/oped/owens/02/racism.html

Even the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which supposedly established the Democrats’ bona fides on race, ***was passed in spite of the Democrats rather than because of them***. Republican Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen pushed the bill through the Senate, despite the no-votes of 21 Democrats, including Gore Sr. and Robert Byrd, who remains a powerful force in the Senate today. In contrast, only four Republicans opposed the bill, mostly like Barry Goldwater on libertarian principles, not segregationist ones.

 


So Bob, this demonstrates to me that you are either grossly uneducated therefore willfully ignorant or simply a Democratic Party hack who has no ethics against lying.

Cowboy,

Here's the true explanation, albeit without the actual names attached to all of the votes. It only took 5 minutes to find it.

http://www.capitalgainsandgames.com/blog/bruce-bartlett/1300/who-opposed-civil-rights-act-1964

Who REALLY supported the Civil Rights Act:

     Even so, one final element was essential to passage of the civil rights billthe strong support of Republicans. Although Democrats had a historically large majority in the House of Representatives with 259 members to 176 Republicans, almost as many Republicans voted for the civil rights bill as Democrats. The final vote was 290 for the bill and 130 against. Of the “yea” votes, 152 were Democrats and 138 were Republicans. Of the “nay” votes, three-fourths were Democrats. In short, the bill could not have passed without Republican support. As Time Magazine observed, “In one of the most lopsidedly Democratic Houses since the days of F.D.R., Republicans were vital to the passage of a bill for which the Democratic administration means to take full political credit this year.”               A similar story is told in the Senate. On the critical vote to end the filibuster by Southern Democrats, 71 senators voted to invoke cloture. With 67 votes needed, 44 Democrats and 27 Republicans joined together to bring the bill to a final vote. Of those voting “nay,” 80 percent were Democrats , including Robert C. Byrd and former Vice President Al Gore’s father , who was then a senator from Tennessee.
Again, it is clear that the civil rights bill would have failed without Republican votes.
Close observers of the Senate deliberations recognized that the Republican leader, Senator Everett McKinley Dirksen of Illinois, had done yeoman work in responding to the objections of individual Republicans and holding almost all of them together in support of the bill. “More than any other single individual,” the New York Times acknowledged, “he was responsible for getting the civil rights bill through the Senate.”


I love exposing ignorance!
It takes either gross partisan ignorance and a willful negligence to not bother to research issues and to post stupidity on line.
Hell, I remember this history...Civil Rights Act was passed when I was a Junior in HS, before the Federal government ruined our educational system.


Thanks, RA, you and Buchanan are right on...

Nothing has caused more misery and destroyed more lives than the so called Great Society ushered in and nursed along by Democrats and RINOs as a vote buying mechanism. While circumstances of the day made it impossible to accomplish at the beginning of our independence, the Constitution was crafted to insure that abolishing slavery would be an inevitable eventuality in spite of Democrat opposition. Great article RaggedyAnn! Thanks for posting it!

By the way, you might be interested Walter Williams comment about leftist lies in the second paragraph of this article: Were the Founding Fathers Racists...

Neo that was a great article! The sad truth is that the liberal progressives took real history out of the schools, and our schools are teaching their socialist agenda and propaganda. The people are believing these lies from the Democratic Party. Do they think the word Progressive is cool? Moving forward. BS! They are turning our people into Socialist Marxist Slaves, and the people are lapping it up and refuse to listen to the truth. The Mainstream Media will not tell the truth because they themselves do not know the truth. They do not want the blacks to know the truth. They are their voting block and they tell them that it is the Republicans fault for their problems. Keep people poor and ignorant and you can control them.

E pluribus Unum - Out of many, one.

 

That was the national motto proposed by Benjamin Franklin, John Adams and Thomas Jefferson in 1776. Both simple and elegant, it embodied the notion that the original 13 Colonies were united as one under the Declaration of Independence.

 

Fast-forward a couple hundred years... The social degeneration of the 1960s and the economic decline of the 1970s, that unity began to disintegrate. This was the era in which multiculturalism emerged -- the era in which ethnocentricity became chic.

 

Arthur Schlesinger, a former Harvard professor and senior advisor to JFK, published a retrospective on this era in 1991 called "The Disuniting of America." Schlesinger wrote primarily about the orthodoxy of self-interested hyphenated-American citizen groups -- who, rather than unifying to become one, were diversifying to become many. He warned that the cult of ethnicity would result in "the fragmentation and tribalization of America," the natural consequence being that these special-interest groups would be co-opted by the political parties.

 

"Instead of a transformative nation with an identity all its own," Schlesinger wrote, "America increasingly sees itself in this new light as preservative of diverse alien identities -- groups ineradicable in their ethnic character." He asserts, by way of inquiry, "Will the melting pot give way to the Tower of Babel?"

 

Leftists for the last half century have been dividing Americans; by propaganizing victimization and instilling hate where they can.  Our President is no exception.

 

Obama's mantra, "change," from the last election, turned out to be a euphemism for constitutional abrogation - an incremental encroachment on liberty until, at last, liberty is lost.

 

Our nation's second president, John Adams, warned, "A Constitution of Government once changed from Freedom, can never be restored.   Liberty, once lost, is lost forever."

 

As for Obama's deception about his own patriotic pedigree, I commend the words of our nation's first president, George Washington: "Guard against the impostures of pretended patriotism. ...[W]here is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation deserts the oaths...?"

 

Regarding the Presidential Oath of Office, Justice Joseph Story wrote: "[T]he duty imposed upon him to take care, that the laws be faithfully executed, follows out the strong injunctions of his oath of office, that he will 'preserve, protect, and defend the constitution.' The great object of the executive department is to accomplish this purpose." He wrote further that if the president does not honor his oath, his office "will be utterly worthless for ... the protection of rights; for the happiness, or good order, or safety of the people."

 

Of course, Barack Obama proposes to further constrain the rights of the people by advancing centralized government control of the economy by way of regulation and forced income redistribution, all in the name of "happiness, good order, and safety of the people," but in direct violation of his oath.

 

Am I a racist because I don't like politically, red-americans.

 

Regarding the Presidental oath of office.........

Did you see the current DC occupant take the Constitutional Oath?  How do you know if and when he legally changed his name from Barry Soetoero to Barack Obama?

Surely as Barry claims to be an attorney, he is well aware that verbal blather means nothing without verifiable documented evidence.....

 

Post A Comment

This user has disabled anonymous commenting.