THE ONLY CHOICE: ANSWERED
For every wife beater allowed to exist, there are one or more victims. Baffling to law enforcement and criminal psychologists is the fact that an astonishing number of those victims willingly return to their abusers even when continued beatings are likely to occur and there is a high probability of the relationship ending in the victim’s death.
The first thing the victim has to figure out to survive is that the abuser is not her friend, and not her protector, but he is her worst nightmare. The same is true for conservative Americans. We have to realize the folks in the Republican Party Establishment (RPE) are not our friends or our protectors. When the wife beater stops by his home on his way from the bar to the race track, he expects to find a clean house, a hot meal, cold beer, and the little woman ready and willing to ignore his stench and serve his every vulgar need without whimper or complaint, or she will suffer the consequences.
The same is true of our 'wife beaters' from the RPE. They expect us to step up without question and tow the party line so they can honor their unholy alliances with the other side of the isle, assuring their above the law status, and their place at the grand banquette of taxpayer largess. In 2008 a deal was cut, and Romney bowed out of the race in favor of McCain. We were then told that a vote for anyone but McCain would be a vote for Obama. Then after securing the nomination, the RPE slammed us in the face with their fists and beat our heads against the walls when McCain did everything but lay on the floor comatose to insure an Obama win.
Why didn’t we learn our lesson before when they did the same thing to us with Bob Dole, granting the embattled Bill Clinton four more years in office? Over and over we heard that, “A vote for anyone but Dole, is a vote for Clinton.” The next thing we knew, our heads were being slammed against the floor while we were raped by the RPE who were willing to sacrifice the Presidency, but retain both houses of Congress, and more importently, retain their above the law status, and their place at the grand banquette of taxpayer largess. Obnoxious and monotonous isn't it?
After taking two major ‘wife beatings’, plus waking up one morning to 100% in sync news coverage that George Bush was anointed the Republican nominee before a single citizen's vote was cast, you would think we would have learned our lesson, but sadly, we have not. Leading up to this post, I promised hope for unity among conservatives. However, for us to achieve that unity, we have to apply a little common sense. Almost every Conservative acknowledges that Michelle Bachmann would be a more fitting candidate than those the RPE, and media et al., allow us to see and rank in the polls, but we aren’t supporting her, or even Ron Paul for that matter, for a number of reasons that aren’t valid at this time for Bachmann or Paul, or any none RPE candidate.
If we yield to pressure when we are told we can’t vote for someone because, it would be a vote for the other side, or they can’t win, or any other unvetted and premature reason, it is the same as yielding to blackmail, especially when the Republican Party Establishment has used this ruse on us year after year. The real shame though, is that we have been so stupid in guarding our rights. They have extorted our general election vote from us, and in that, we can at least sooth our lack of courage by telling ourselves the risk of losing the election outweighs our duty to cast an honorable vote.
But why are we giving them a freebie in the primaries? We know there is little chance we can overcome the power and corruption among the Republican or Democrat Party elites, but why would we embolden them by caving-in before the primary elections or caucuses even begin, and by pretending a vote for Gingrich or Romney would be our first choice? If however, we throw our support behind Bachmann for now, even if we think she can’t win the primary or general election, at least we would demonstrate that the power to vote is ours, not theirs, and that we are on our way to taking all of our power back.
If Bachmann losses in the primary or drops out, then we’ve lost nothing by supporting her now since we will then still have the full opportunity to vote against Obama and in unity for the establishment candidate. On the other hand, if Bachmann even makes a good showing, she will force Gingrich and Romney to move to the right to fend off her challenge. Best case scenario, if she wins the primary election, we will have a candidate all conservatives can back without holding our noses, and the RPE will have no choice but to back her as well, unless their real intentions are to throw the election again, in which case none of our efforts will matter in the general election anyway.
Whatever the outcome of the presidential election in 2012, please refer to drDrjojo’s comment on my previous post: "We have to try our best to elect Conservatives to the US Congress as well as state and local positions. We can't just worry about the White House or feel defeated if we don’t take back the White House [in this election]. The media is trying to tell people the Conservative movement is dying, but that is not true. They know they took a beating in 2010 and will stop at nothing to try to beat us to a pulp."
I for one am no longer willing to submit to any sort of beating from anyone without a fight. How about you?
User Comments
You are absolutely right! Thanks for your comment Rachel! Good to see you...did you take a few days off from blogging? |
Well, glad you're back! I'm signing off for now, but will watch for your new post later if you put one up! :) |
I agree....Romney's their candidate of choice for good reason and we're supposed to be too dense to realize it. Appears some self proclaimed "intellectuals" really are. |
Excellent observation husbandofawife! You remind us that we just have to think beyond the overt and react with logic, not emotion. Great comment, thanks! |
I believe the media and RPE's are underestimating us to their peril. But it's up to us to stay united and strong.....we can be our own worse enemy if we allow it. Great post neo. |
Thanks Bev! Your spot on. We have to be united, but think logically about how that best manifests itself in our struggle. We can't win this if we emulate the emotionally unstable left. They are the haters, screamers, and idealists easily led by any reward on a stick. We as realists must calculate our moves, accepting self-denial if need be, to survive as free citizens and not teat suckers. We can't become our own worst enemies in the process. We need to form our own version of the Spartan Phalanx, let them have their Ephialtes! We don't need talking heads to form our own lines in the primaries, and we can reform in the general if need be! For now, showing zero support for establishment anointed candidates will force them out or change them for the better...either outcome moves us closer to OUR goal. |
Thanks Bev. We should remember too, Obama or the nature of his bid for re-election is not cast in stone. The Democrats have not embraced the Caddell and Schoen WSJ article a few days ago calling for Obama to step aside in favor of Hillary running, but it reinforces that the game does change occasionally in an uncertain world. If Obama or Joe Biden were to become ill, or if Biden were to pull a major gaff, and become a liability, it would almost certainly draw Clinton into the picture in some capacity. If that happened, as polarizing as HRC is, there is a significant number who support her. If she replaced or joined the ticket, is there any doubt what would happen? No conservative male establishment front runner would be able to mount a serious challenge against the media war that would be waged in her favor. I doubt any significant number of reformed former Clinton supporters would revert, but they might stay home and leave the outcome to providence. I think in that case, we would be begging for a conservative woman to counter the Hillary factor. |
Neo, this has been a very good post, unfortunately the general public does not know how they are manipulated on all fronts. James news |
Speaking of bigger "giveittoment"...have you read this? I havenot checked it for truthfulness... http://truthfrequencynews.com/?p=22282 Senators Demand the Military Lock Up American Citizens in a “Battlefield” They Define as Being Right Outside Your WindowPublished on November 25, 2011
The worldwide indefinite detention without charge or trial provision is in S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act bill, which will be on the Senate floor on Monday. The bill was drafted in secret by Sens. Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) and passed in a closed-door committee meeting, without even a single hearing. I know it sounds incredible. New powers to use the military worldwide, even within the United States? Yet when I clicked on: The worldwide indefinite detention without charge or trial provision It took me here: https://secure.aclu.org/site/Advocacy?cmd=display&page=UserAction&id=3865&s_subsrc=fixNDAA Urge the Senate to Oppose Indefinite Military Detention
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter The U.S. Senate is considering the unthinkable: changing detention laws to imprison people — including Americans living in the United States itself — indefinitely and without charge. The Defense Authorization bill — a "must-pass" piece of legislation — is headed to the Senate floor with troubling provisions that would give the President — and all future presidents — the authority to indefinitely imprison people, without charge or trial, both abroad and inside the United States. Urge your Senators to oppose sections 1031 and 1032 of the Defense Authorization bill. It did NOT list Bill 1867 anywhere. |
| I just saw this on another site. Senate To Vote On Legislation That Allows U.S. Military to Detain Americans Without Charge or Trial |
This needs to be stopped. If they decided to they could detain anyone that did not agree with them...you or me or...anyone. |
Amen! I guess that's why we all hate Congress but people keep voting in their own career politicians for bringing home the bacon! Great comment Patriot, thanks! |
Amen! I've noticed people are a lot more willing to listen than they were a couple of years ago too! |



Email
Print Article
Favorites
Report Abuse
.....yep, busy busy time lately.
Have a blessed day.


It is not a secret the major portion of the media is pro democrat. The media chose McCain.
The most interesting thing is; that many people tend to choose a candidate on what the candidate says, without ever having made their own decision on what is acceptable.
Seriously, how can a person who does not know or understand their own God given rights know which candidate is best suited? They DON'T! And that is why you see candidates who are elected on looks, race, unconstitutional issues, media coverage, a photo opp, a free cup of coffee and other nonsense!