Visitors
GINGRICH GUT CHECK
I'm probably going to offend a few people who call themselves Republicans, Conservatives, and Christians, but who are in reality RINOS and CINOS (Conservatives or Christians in name only). So be it, I'm calling upon my conservative and Christian friends to take a gut check and act accordingly. If the shoe fits, you have two choices, repent or wear it, but know that continuing down this path, you are part of the problem.
Any who have read my posts and comments know that I abhor the massive amount of hypocrisy coming from the left, and I point it out whenever I encounter it. More often than not, that has left me alone arguing against hedonists and the hedonist agenda. I despised Ted Kennedy, and still despise Barny Frank, Bill Clinton, and a long list of pleasure addicted self-serving politicians whom in the past, we have lifted up in honor to occupy our seats of power.
You also know that whenever a leader who calls himself a Republican or feigns the mantle of conservatism but behaves like a liberal or otherwise immoral goat, I condemn them for it. I expect Democrats to be corrupt, unreliable, and unprincipled but when they infiltrate the ranks of the Republican party, as they always will being human, I want them to stand down or be thrown down with as much haste as we can muster.
If we are Christians, we understand that this war between good and evil, is God's to fight and win. He doesn't need us, nor is our humble contribution of any significance in the final outcome. What we are charged with as Christians, is personally doing the right thing to the best of our ability, and trust in God to complete the process He has begun as He has told us He will.
If we are Conservatives, we should understand that only true men of integrity and faithful commitment to conservative standards can advance our cause. The very essence of conservatism is an ideology grounded in principles of individual rights preserved by self-determination and self-sacrifice as opposed to dependency and selfish pleasures at the expense of others. The twin virtues of Christian morals and conservative values allow 100% of Americans to share the yoke of freedom. It doesn't matter if we are Muslim, Jew, Christian, or Atheist...either one or the other of morals or values allows us to join together in building a prosperous nation where every citizen can enjoy freedom and the right to pursue happiness.
We now have four remaining candidates running for the GOP nomination for President. Three of those, as far as I can tell, are moral men who have dedicated their lives, and more importantly, lived their lives serving God, and caring for their families and the nation.
One candidate however, has a sordid financial, moral, and mental health record starting with having sex with his teacher when he was 16 years old and ending with multiple incidences of adultery, public lying, divorce, depression, and being sued in a court of law before he would even support his own abandoned children through court ordered child-support. Add to that, a disgraceful record of flip-flopping and betrayal that caused his own party members to force him from the House Speakership, and near destruction of the Republic party under his watch, how can it be anything but hypocrisy to support this man over any one of the other three who have honored our values and morals?
Many stand on the assertion that we are all sinners and should forgive. That is a false premise. Only God can reconcile Newt Gingrich's soul and forgive his sins. But as Christians, we must not presume to forgive him on behalf of those he betrayed...we do not have that right. We may pray for him, befriend and help him in any way we can to improve his life personally and financially, but we have no right to lift him over men of greater integrity and place him in a seat of honor and power over our fellow citizens. That would be the same for a Christian, as publicly extolling the virtues of Satan.
Personally I've not chosen anyone to support so far, but I am appalled particularly at so called conservatives who spread lies and slurs against Mitt Romney. His name is butchered and made fun of, and his legitimate business successes criticised. Are we Capitalists or not? If you agree with the Occupy Wall Street crowd and hate capitalism, so be it, but don't condemn a man whom I suspect is hated mostly for his religion, while holding up a socialist and hedonists as your preferred choice instead. We criticise Obama but it is based upon facts not childish emotions.
If you are not a Christian, but consider yourself a conservative and support Gingrich, please reconsider based upon the fact that what has been presented to us as a conservative record for Gingrich is a pure lie. Just one example of Gingrich's fraud that makes my blood boil is his claim of being a Reagan conservative. When most Republicans backed Reagan, Gingrich only begrudgingly joined his party on the record where he would otherwise be exposed, but verbally campaigned openly against Reagan joining with liberal Democrats like Ted Kennedy, Chris Dodd, and Jim Wright in bitter anti-Reagan rhetoric.
Am I the only one that threw things at the TV when Gingrich, desperate to save his own hide, exposed himself as a low life turncoat? Gingrich once called Reagan's meeting with Mikhail Gorbachev, "the most dangerous summit for the West since Adolf Hitler met with Neville Chamberlain in 1938." In a floor statement in 86' he said, "Measured against the scale and momentum of the Soviet empire's challenge, the Reagan administration has failed, is failing, and without a dramatic change in strategy will continue to fail...President Reagan is clearly failing." Gingrich was a turncoat bastard in a clinch then, and I see no reason to trust him today.
In hind sight we know that Reagan was right and Gingrich was wrong, but more important is to recognize that Gingrich was willing to betray everything he professed to believe in and so he bet on the wrong horse because it was in his estimate, the smart career move. That's what career politicians do, and whatever else he is, Gingrich is known to be a career politician, a liar, and adulterer, and a Washington insider influence peddler.
I've only scratched the surface here, so imagine what Obama (and Pelosi) will do with the entire record and months and millions to spend educating America on Obama's opponent. The debates are already set, so the rpeated call for Lincoln Douglas debates by Gingrich is absurd, but do you really think Gingrich could stand up to an Obama armed with Gingrich's true record? Hardly. Let me just say that if you are one supporting Gingrich after this knowledge, you are a hypocrite at best. Don't be a hypocrite...the left already has that post well occupied.
Note: There is an article with audio available here GINGRICH and REAGAN
Email
Print Article
Favorites
Report Abuse
User Comments
 |
It's nice to know I'm not alone Nota! Do to some experience with bloviating windbags that remind me of Gingrich, I sometimes question by own dislike for him. But then he opens his mouth again and I think, nope, he's a scoundrel! In the 80's we didn't have the kind of news coverage we have now so when he became speaker, I felt like the Lone Ranger arguing to my conservative family and friends that he was no conservative. With everything we have available today, people can be in denial if they choose, but ignorance is no excuse. Great comment Nota! Thanks! |
 |
Neo, I read your comments below. I am so gald the internet is available so that we can research and find the things that people said/wrote from before tha t they are lying about now. One example is Gingrich's daughter coming out and saying Gingrich did not discuss their devorice with his wife while she was in the hospital... http://americaneedsmitt.com/blog/2012/01/17/deadbeat-dad-newt-put-kids-work/ I found this article very interesting to say the least....Newt far in debt...not paying child support...infidility....on two wives that were ill....does not say anything good for his morals-nor his ability to control hinself. |
|
Knowing now what politicians of the past were able to get away with, it's hard to imagine how we survived without the Internet. Very interesting article linked above...thank you. I have a thick dossier on Gingrich but I'm hoping the CNN debate in Florida tonight will signal the beginning of the end of his run and I can put it away and turn my efforts toward exposing Obama. The primary should not be this much concern, but it was Gingrich who first stood on the "Reagan 11th Commandment" but then decided to go commando instead and launch into hyper-critical mode blowing the doors off of decorum by even attacking Captialism. That was the last straw for me. I guess he already broke the ten real commandments, so Reagan's 11th was all that was left! LOL ...Anyway, there is enough info out on Gingrich now it will be hard for him to sell his pretending to admire Reagan act. |
 |
I feel ya there, Neo. I get the same when i explain how Ron Paul is the only REAL conservative of the bunch. Newt,warts and all, still is a better choice than either of the other two frat boy, hypocrits in Mitt and Rick. We can agree to disagree, but Mitt is NO conservative and will NOT repaeal Obie care and we all know it. Sanitarium, well, just google "Santorum corruption" and grab a barf bag. Both of these two have multi-million $ Medicare Frauds on their political/lobbyist/M&A rap sheets. So how do they rise to the definition of a true Conservative? A: they don't. I for one, will not stand by and let the Rommunnists force another RINO "electable" candidate down my throat. I'll be entrenched in the Paul camp on caucus day. Feel free to line up behind the shepherd of your own choosing. Mine will the one who loves the Constitution more than a podium or a Swiss account. |
|
I don't think Santorum is an issue...they're suppressing polls presently but if not today, then by Monday they'll have to release new data and we'll know the trend. By all means we should prosecute and jail criminals but the fraud etc., claims flying in all directions are complex and are opinion based or hyperbole. If everyone in the country who worked for, invested in, or ran a major corporation were prosecuted under these sort of accusations, we would have to shut the country down and go back to barter and survival of the fittest. Do you have a problem with investing in funds held in Swiss accounts? May I ask why? I'm not being flippant, but are you aware of the vital role foreign investment plays in our free markets and how corporations are taxed on foreign investments when profits are repatriated? My Shepherd is Jesus Christ. This election however, is what it is, and as disadvantaged as our present predicament finds us, we've made great progress. I'm not quiting, and not conceding defeat because heathens are at the gate. Thank God we still have a great country, great countrymen to stand with, and the force of will and might to our favor. Would you not agree? Thanks for your comment Carpenter. |
|
My problem is not with investing my funds in a foreign nation so much as seeing a prospective leader keep his hid there or to avoid US taxation. And I am indeed very aware of foreign investmest and taxation upon repatriation issues and how they pertain to our econonmy. And I'll say what I always do: "They(foreign investors and Central Banks in general) need us waaaay more than we need them." But let me address this:" If everyone in the country who worked for, invested in, or ran a major corporation were prosecuted under these sort of accusations, we would have to shut the country down and go back to barter and survival of the fittest." Accusations do not equal prosecution. For this we have due process. The absence of ANY prosecutions of CEO and Co. officers, gives no less than carte blanche freedom to continue to sodomize us. Under your premise, we should never jail an executive? Consequences, or the lack of them is what has gotten us to this point, no? Begin holding accountable the Rommunists and Sanitorums and Corzines now and after the first few sign in at Leavenworth, the rest will quickly get in line. Right after the suck up the power vacuum left by the newly incarcerated. I assure you, commerce will NOT grind to a halt. Corruption will. And once the market place is again made safe for the average investor, then and only then will the savers begin investing again. But please don't line up behind Santorum based on spiritual belief. He tells us what a small government Conservative he is when his Senate voting record clearly indicates otherwise. This is the easiest one thing we can check about each of these candidates: How DID they vote vs. what are SAYING they believe in. If he's so spiritual, why is he so given to fabrications? That is one of the Commandments last time I checked. Soryy I didn't get back here in a timely fashion. |
 |
None of the Newt bashing is making me feel any better about candidate Romney. I hate, I repeat HATE gutter-bashing. http://spectator.org/blog/2012/01/26/attention-elliott-abrams-on-ne#comments At this point I only know with complete certitude who I won't be voting for. Obama. |
|
AJay, there is one problem with the Jeffrey Lords apologist piece you posted...Gingrich himself. Lords can point to others claiming Gingrich never opposed Reagan, but he can't dispute the record. I added a video of Gingrich himself above, proving Lords is wrong and also proving that Abrams was telling the truth about Gingrich. My entire point is that we are being handled in order to put Gingrich in the same position we were handled to put McCain in...and that is to lose to Obama. If Gingrich is not eliminated and eliminated soon, Obama WILL have another term in office. If we play hide the truth now, do you think we can count on the Democrats to do the same in the General election? Politics ain't pretty, and it shouldn't be either...I have no problem with bashing all the candidates with the truth. I have a big problem with covering up birth certificates, adultery, betrayal, liberal college professor's true histories whether it is Obama or Gingrich. I won't vote for Obama either, nor will I vote for him indirectly by doing for Gingrich what we criticise the left of doing for Obama and ending up with an unelectable scoundrel representing our side. |
|
AJay, thanks for your comment! I appreciate your views, and I respect your opinions even when we disagree! |
|
http://markamerica.com/2012/01/26/drudge-distort-what-will-be-the-reaction-to-the-war-on-gingrich/ I quote: Limbaugh talked about this extensively on his show today, saying the following, among other things: “It was everything you wish was happening today, is all I can tell you. It was everything you wish the entire Republican Party was doing today. It was led by Newt Gingrich, and what was he doing? He was defending Reagan. Now, all of this stuff that hit Drudge and everywhere else last night about Newt telling everybody the country goes to hell if they continue Reaganism and that Newt insulted Reagan and that the Reagan administration failed and Iran-Contra… I never heard any of that. I started doing this particular program in Sacramento in 1984, and I was just as immersed in national politics then as I am now, and I could honestly tell you this.” "There’s a reason Rush can’t remember it the way Drudge is broadcasting it: It didn’t happen the way Drudge’s site would lead you to believe, and this is simply a desperately disgusting attempt to do to Gingrich what has been done to others with the distortions. A year ago, if you had told me Drudge did things this way, I would have scoffed at it, but now… I’m clearly coming to see Drudge in a different light. I realize that many people have many reasons to be unhappy with Gingrich on one issue or another, and I’m inclined to be annoyed with him too, but this has gone too far, in my view, and I’m not inclined to suffer it any longer. If Drudge is going to be a media participant in this smear-fest, let him, but I won’t be adding much to his page-view statistics any longer. The simple truth is that American conservatives and Tea Party folk are tired of the media and the GOP establishment leading them around by the noses. It’s not that people are so infatuated with Gingrich so much as it is that they are disgusted by these tactics, and they’re simply disenchanted with the GOP establishment controlling the outcome of our primary system."
You're correct in one thing for sure Neo."We are being 'handled' ".
The only question now is WHO is doing "the handling" and WHY? I am not a Republican nor have I ever been. You know I was a Democrat for many years. I am innately suspicious of this sudden foul concentrated attack out of right field immediately before a FLA Primary...which just happens to be (if I'm not mistaken) a "winner-take-all-delegates" primary. Truth is I trust tea party motives far more than any established political party at this point in history. |
|
First let me say that I was unaware Drudge had posted anything on this. I posted that same video on tunnelhillbilly's site a week ago. Also, I believe there have been claims anew of "sudden attacks" against Gingrich at each debate since Gingrich himself broke his own vow to honor the previously much touted 11th Commandment. I'm not a Rush fan for the very reason that he spends far too much time preaching the establishment mantra...the same thing I have accused FOX and Hannity of repeatedly. Both only tolerate the Tea Party. Most Tea Party members have been framed as supporting Gingrich when the rank and file are anything but Gingrich or establishment supporters. Remember the big feud that errupted among Tea Party groups because the Tea Party Express was seen as a Republican Establishment drive to infiltrate the Tea Party and the posts and comments I wrote warning against the Tea Party forming into a political party or letting any one group ge too large where they risk becoming targets for establishment takeover? Why do you think Glenn Beck was thrown off of FOX AJay? He supported the Tea Party movement, and bucked the establishment forcing both O'Reilly and Hannity to roll back their blatent support for establishment policies. As for the full length PBS video, I encourage anyone with the time to watch it to do so, since it not only supports the extracted section, it reveals just how Progressive Gingrich already was at the time it was taped. He would run out of town on rail if gave that interview today when we've seen the Obama administration in action and know both the code langueage and damage potential of the Progressive movement. The establishment RINOs today call it "Moderate," but back then it was refered to as "Center Right." And what does Gingrich say in the video? That we have to move away from Reagan post Carter ideals and move to the "Center Right." Regardless who is for or against Gingrich, I made up my mind years ago and I'm hoping that his own volumuous historical record has already damaged him beyond repair. Even if he were a loyal conservative, he is emotionally unstable, and far too controversial to do anything but damage the country if he were nominated, much less elected President. I can match anyone article for article on Gingrich, but as I told Nota above I prefer not to at this point. If he is finished as I hope he is, I would prefer to see him get out of the way and allow the rest of the candidates to focus on Obama instead of each other. On top of everything else, Gingrich is an obnoxious pious ass and we already have one of those in office. |
|
LOL Hope you can read through all the typos. Rushed and answering the phone while typing...this is why I do not text and drive!! |
|
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lV0QkgHvJ-c&feature=youtu.be Mark Levin Teams Up With Jeffery Lord And They Start Swinging In Defense Of Newt GingrichLevin: "If this is what the conservative movement has become.....then I don't want any part of it." I agree with Mark Levin. This crap being invented about Newt IS disturbing. An out and out Repub Party elite SMEAR is being run on Gingrich. From what I see, Romney was never mentioned by Reagan, nor was Romney's Father. So How well did Romney know Reagan's mind? Not at all, is my guess. Yet Nancy Reagan, who was jealously protective of Ronald Reagan was nothing but cordial and well-spoken of Newt Gingrich.
Believe the lies if you will Neo, but beware, Romney has changed his stripes so often he has become a blur. |
|
AJay, these are not lies, they are Gingrich's record. And I'm not supporting Romney or anyone else...I'm only saying that it is absurd to promote a reprobate like Gingrich over the other three candidates, any one of which would be better than Gingrich. I do believe Romney is taking heat right now because he is the front runner, but promoting Gingrich will not end Romney's position, it will only damage his ability to beat Obama if he is nominated. If you want to truly reduce the Romney lead, get the divisive whiner Gingrich out of the way and let the other two rise up and give Romney a legitimate challenge. Look how the party is divided over Gingrich now! That is what caused Republican losses when he was Speaker and caused him to resign in disgrace (A FACT). His repeated adultery, poor personal finance management, depression, dividing the party and causing lost seats and Republicans turning against him in droves are all irrefutable empirical facts. You may be fine with his tawdry treatment of women, drinking, not paying child support, flip-flopping on his position on issues, selling influence by taking millions from Fredie Mac while schmoozing with Pelosi and other radical leftists, but can't you see there are enough conservatives who abhor these things and will not support him to make him an un-viable candidate in a national election? Debate are on CNN right now, so I've gotta go. Thanks for the reply AJay! |
|
promote a reprobate like Gingrich the divisive whiner Gingrich his tawdry treatment of women schmoozing with Pelosi Deal in divisive inflammatory rhetoric much Neo?
My sincere respectful suggestion is that you save it for Obama after we choose a nominee. |
|
LOL Point taken. They do match Obama pretty well, and fortunately there is no budget on words other than overuse does tend to drive readers away. |
 |
I'll vote for the man that can & will reverse this Constitution destroying Administration. Right now I'll go with Gingrich. I'm not choosing according to moral or spiritual values, only God knows their heart. |
|
"Spiritual values" has nothing to do with this Con...I think I made that clear when I said, "Only God can reconcile Newt Gingrich's soul and forgive his sins." But we judge moral values and the behavior every day. It is not only our right, but our duty. You can choose as you please but knowingly putting someone with Gingrich's record as "our choice" to supplant someone we didn't vote for (Obama), removes us from any pretense of innocence or plausible deniability. Would you make a thief Chief of Police, or a license a child molester to run a day care? What's the difference? Support a hedonist if you will, but own it for what it is. There is no room for piety while willing choosing the leaders God has warned he would put over us. We'll have to disagree on this one my friend. Thanks for your comment. |
|
Newt may be an SOB, but maybe that's what we need. He would be easier to control than Obama, even the Democrats would help. |
|
You may have a point there Con. Are you watching the debate? I'll be interesting to hear the comments and polling after. |
|
That is the problem, Con. Gingrich would be easy to control and the highest payee(s) would control him. |
 |
I can't stand Newt. Never could. Even when he was the fair-haired boy of the Republican party, long before any of the scandals broke loose....there was just something about him I couldn't stand. |
|
I agree, and before there was blogging I had no idea how to support my opinions, so the fair haired boy image caused me a lot of grief among my conservative friends! :) Thanks very much for your comment Mamakat! |
 |
So, we can choose a lying, cheating, sinful, scumbag Republican or we can choose a lying, hate-mongering, anti-American communist thug who wants to destroy this country and enslave us to third-world poverty. There is difficulty in deciding? |
|
Maybe, but we're still at the part where we select a candidate to run against the hate-mongering, anti-American communist thug who wants to destroy this country and enslave us to third-world poverty. There is a MSM push to ignore the rest and elect Gingrich, who would be the worst of four Republican candidates still in the race. Every comment on the MSM including FOX and establishment broadcasters promotes Gingrich and downplays or criticises Romney, presumably because he is the front runner obstructing Gingrich's rise. The other two are ignored all together. The people objecting to Gingrich are not the MSM, it is citizens like me and the Fifth Estate (blogs, independent journalists, authors, and Internet magazines and commentators, etc.). By the way, Gingrich is falling flat on his face in the debate tonight. Santorum and Paul have both gained points by pointing out how the Gingrich feud with Romney is distracting from important issues. It looks like Gingrich has spent his ammunition and is all out. Hopefully after tonight we have seen the last of the endless fighting and squabbling that has accompanied Gingrich's very long and sordid career. |
|
Neo, I wasn't referring to Newt specifically. According to Republicans all the candidates are sorry, worthless rotters in one respect or another. I don't like any of them. Those looking for a saint are fools. Those waiting for God are delusional. Most people on the right cannot grasp the gravity of the situation. This is America's last chance to remain partially free for a while longer. If Obama wins, there'll be no more elections. The Constitution is already in tatters. The economy is in ruins. We'll have Islamic and/or communistic rule from now to the very end.
|
|
I understand retired. I know how you feel, and I do not disagree at all. I think though that the rhetoric will turn toward Obama once we get past the primaries, and the sooner the better. Almost everyone who has picked their primary pony also says they will support whoever runs against Obama. I'm not picking or criticising any but the one I know who will erode our Constitution and split the party if he wins...that's not his talk, but it is his walk. Read my comment on Nota's Post Constitutional President post and you'll get my drift on that. Thanks very much for your comment and keep the faith my friend...we ain't dead so we ain't done yet. |
 |
I read somewhere here on Blogster this week (when it came to Gingrich) that the bloggter could care LESS about morals or Newt's personal life - if he could beat Obama - then that's who'd get their vote. If you ever check Drudge's page, earlier today it was FULL of story after story about Newt's badmouthing of Ronald Reagan - but the other night after his SC win - every other word coming out of his mouth was Reagan and all the things that the two of them together had accomplished over the years Reagan was President. Talk about speaking out of both sides of his mouth. This man is scarey to me. I'm letting you guys sort out the Republican side of this battle. I know the money that goes into running for office "helps" the economy with regards to the businesses called upon for various things, but something makes me a little sick to see 100 million dollars being spent to win the office while regular Americans live paycheck to paycheck or struggle to pay medical bills. It makes me wonder if any of them on any side can relate to the problems facing the majority of this country. And where does the majority of that money come from??? Could it be the mega corporations, banks, or insurance companies who really "own" the office? All of it really makes me sick. I'm of the opinion that there are no people of real quality and character who'd even want to get near politics in general or in particular serve as our President. And I include both parties in this opinion. I do happen to agree with your opinion on Gingrich though, and I seriously doubt (hope hope) he doesn't win the nomination. |
|
You've identified the true fulcrum. It is not between those who believe he is a Choir Boy for conservatism and those who think he's not truly conservative. Gingrich's record is huge and it is what it is so there can be no doubt. No, the real choice barring denial, is whether integrity matters in our leaders or not. I also agree, it has become obscene the amount of money spent on Presidential and Congressional campaigns. Eventually the people will have to become angry enough to force some equitable solution. It's one of those issues that Congress won't change because they are so corrupt, and they continue to be corrupt because it never changes. Thanks very much for you comment Cats! |
 |
Holy crap Batman! That is the best "My way or the Highway", I've ever read! I do apologize for all of us slackers leaving it to "you alone " arguing against hedonists and the hedonist agenda. Since I don't want to be a CINA, I will join those "Christains, Jews, Muslims and Atheist..either one or the other of morals or values allows us to join together in building a prosperous nation where every citizen can enjoy freedom and the right to pursue happiness." I don't know WTH, I just agreed to but I trust you Neo! I am going to repent and vote for the white Obama! (No offense, just kidding you) |
|
To tell you the truth Arkansasmama, I'm not sure you agreed to anything or if you're pulling my leg, but that is one of the best and most creative committal/non-committal comments I've ever read! If you ever decide to run for President, I'm voting for YOU!!! LOL Hey, no offense taken ever, and I very much appreciate your comments always! :) Oh, and for the record, I'm not endorsing "the white Obama." I know we're out of time so it's a moot point, but actually I would like to have seen someone rise up and make it a good run for the money. Too bad Bachmann is out, but if wishes were horses, I guess we could all ride. :/ |
|
I hope and pray there is no other Obama of any color. WE THE PEOPLE need a good clean Christian person in office whom is willing to force the socialists out of this government for good and repeal all the filth they have done... |
|
Thanks Nota! A Christian would be nice but since we can't look into a candidates heart, we have to look for good character. Hedonism aside, I wouldn't mind someone professing any religion or none if they have good ethics and support our Constitution. |
|
Neo, I don't think any Republican woman could ever become Pres/VP. Even if she were a Saint. If the libs didn't destroy her, our party would. |
|
"Ever" is a long time but I'm afraid you're right...at least for the time being. :( |
 |
I have watched every debate in order to learn as much as I can about all the candidates, but at this point I am so disgusted with all candidates running for President. The infighting between all the candidates absolutely makes me sick. Part of the problem is the moderators thinks the great questions to ask, are questions to get them all to fight with each other. I want to see the questions of substance, like what would you do about the Unemployment, the regulations and the Laws that are being put on us by the UN? I also want to know the answers to other serious questions. By all this fighting, they are guaranteeing that Obama will win a second term. That is the reason the likes of CNN, NBC ask the questions they do. They have an agenda. I still think that Gingrich can out debate Obama, and put him in studder mode. I do not trust Romney, and think that Sanatorium is too wimpy. I will never vote for Ron Paul due to his wanting to legalize all drugs, and I do not agree with his foreign Policy. The man is a stand up comic... I tried sitting in on a few Libertarian meetings locally, and could not stick with it due to his liberal policies. So where does that leave us? I guess we vote for whom ever the Exalted Republican Party decides we vote for, and say a prayer as we mark our ballots? |
|
Hi Marian! Lincoln Douglass style debates would be a dream for Gingrich, with the first candidate getting an hour to speak without interruption, then the opponent having an hour and a half, followed by the first speaker getting a final half hour for rebuttal. There is no chance of that happening since the debates are already set and I think it's a moot point anyway since Gingrich faltered badly last night. I don't know where that leaves us, but I guess we just have to hold on as long as we can and hope we get our country back to a Constitutional Republic! Thanks very much for your comment Marian. I know this post has been a downer, but I'm sure brighter days are ahead if we can just live long enough to see them! lol |
 |
you know whats really fun? Watching the Conservatives argue over their choices. It gives one a warm feeling. It's really a wonderful thing to watch that party implode in front of my eyes. The way you all talk about and judge others character that don't see eye to eye with you all is really amusing as well. Keep doing it. While you all try to find out which worthless guy to nominate, we're working hard to make sure we get the Senate and the White House both, so Obama can get on with his job. We so want to thank you for giving us so much material to use against who ever runs against the President. Thanks again! |
|
Happy to see you're so easily amused Charlie! It makes the vigorous work of vetting a good replacement ever so much easier while Obama's lazy follower sit on their asses lamenting the jobs they used to have when Obama wasn't in office. Thanks for your comment. :) |
|
oh, lmao , trust me...no ones sitting. Only we're working harder to make sure it all happens in a land slide, and yes it is totally amusing to see you all with your panties in a wad over it. It is almost like shooting fish in a barrel, or watching monkeys play with a footbal. Thanks so much! We will probably give the newtser amn the mittster some kinda award for all the helpful work they did for the Obama campaign. Making it so simple to merely have to cut and paste pieces of the debates together to make his own commercials. Amazing work ya'll have done! |
|
If you think Obama doesn't already have anything you're reading on Blogster, than you're more naive than even I thought. After sniveling for me to leave you alone the other day on your pal winning's blog, here you are trolling with idiotic rhetoric. You've wasted enough of my time proving your lack of depth or reason, so unless you have something relevant to offer, we're done here, right? Right. |
|
oh my, I'm not giving you one once of crap here Neo. Just stating a few facts, you all don't seem to get out much, Obama is rising in the polls everyday, and your guys are falling behind, it's just truth. I didn't snivel either, I told you I had been gone a month and you were jumpin on me and my OPINION. To top it off, I was talking to winning at the time and had not talked to you at all. So tell the truth. No, we won't be done here until i laugh at you in November after you all lose the Senate and dont take the white house. America is pissed off and is realizing just exactly how much the right has been lying and holding back the recovery. You'll see. I will laugh last. Then I'll be done here..... |
|
Nope, your done now. You haven't stated anything of substance, but only offered insult and ridicule. See ya troll. |
 |
Its tough to know where to start on this one. I got up this morning, anxious to dive in on Blogster because I haven't been able to get on here in months. I looked for "certain peoples" blogs and what they were writing about as I had one in mind to write, and maybe I could "steal" some of thier best points... |
. Now...on to Newt. It wasn't until this phenomenom, that I truly knew in my heart that "conservatism" was all but dead, at least what I thought of as conservatism. I railed against Clinton and Lewinski all the time saying CHARACTER DOES MATTER, and thought most of my countrymen believed as I did. That is not so. Enter Gingrich. Newt is as bad, if not worse than Bill Clinton ever was and now...because some errantly believe HE can beat Obama, CHARACTER aient so important anymore. Well...good to see that IT IS still important to the sad few of us left. CA above, whom I despise as a useless idiot, said it best in his comments, and he will have the last laugh I'm afraid...well...not the last laugh, but you get my point. Without divine intervention, which I do not rule out, President Obama will remain in his office in January and the destruction of what was Once known as The United States of America will be complete. I'll stop there before I write a "post" in your comment section. Its lonely being a real Conservative these days, glad for your company Neo...hope all is well with you and yours. See ya on the "front lines". |
It occurred to me I wouldn't be very popular with this one when I posted it. It's a quandary to me too Bill, when the choice here seems so obvious. After everything we have all said about morally devoid politicians, how can we make a deal with the devil to fight the devil? Anyway, thanks very much for your support!! Good to see you, and yes, you can post this wherever you like. This blog is wide open for viewing. I only have anonymous comment restricted so I can control the trolls. |
|
BTW....can I post this on FB? I don't know what your "settings" are and if its friends only or something like that they wouldnt be able to read it, but some of my FB friends should read this too. |
|
Thanks...Yep, anytime! See above. |
|
Ok...hopefully some of my fellow "conservatives" will get a gut check. I'm not holding my breath, but we do what we can. |
 |
Neo: don't have time to read all the comments here but Gingrich is not my cup of tea. The other day I posted a comment on a big hit Blog @ Fox about Newt's lack of integrity and honesty in the past. I rec'd numerous replies by fellow posters that I wasn't voting for a "Choir Boy" but a POTUS. Guess they don't care if the person has a behavior pattern that concerns me since I am a believer that moral values carry over in every decision we make in our lives. |
|
I agree with you, moral values very much affect every decision. There is another overarching implication in the present situation. Rather than retyping the whole thing, if you find the time, take a look at my reply to FedUpToHere on his post. Our very existence as a free nation is at stake in this: Too bad Dr. Laurie Roth... Thanks very much for your comment Hershey! :) |
|
Neo: headed over there now but thought I'd share the nic that Imus has given Newt FYI.... Imus calls Newt : SkunkVomit Full confession: I watch Imus in the Morning cuz I like the music! |
|
LOL "SkunkVomit" ...appropriate! Thanks :) |
|
Neo: always nice to make you smile. |
 |
great post and comments Neo,,,NO Newty!Cant stand the man and his form of conservatism HA!,, Love Santorum but don't think he's gonna be the big boys choice to run. |
I do not trust Gingrich as I have often said in my comments. He is a self serving flip-flopper. We have one liar, thief and thug in the White House right now. We do NOT need another.