Welcome to Blogster!
72,186 Blogster Users  |  365,643 Posts
 
 
 

mmmhollywould

 

Blog Traffic: 105925

Posts: 591

My Comments: 10382

User Comments: 10667

Photos: 192

Friends: 472

Following: 142

Followers: 74

Points: 13935

Last Online: 7 minutes ago


 
 

Friends


 

 

 

 

 
 
 

Recent Viewers


 

 

 

 

 
 

Doing Da Butt : The Bible Agrees

Added: Sunday, June 14th 2009 at 1:25pm by mmmhollywould
 
 
 

 

 

I read anything and every thing I can find about the Bible and had never really considered this question.

 

Is anal sex a violation of Biblical/ God's rules?

 

My personal answer is, no. Sodomy in the Bible refers to non-specific sexual sin. I do not recall ANYWHERE in the Bible where anal sex is distinctly forbidden. Some might try to say that well it forbids homosexuality therefore..........BIG leap. I am willing to bet there are more straight people that practice anal sex than there are gay people who do. Why? Well there are more straight people than gay, almost all men want do a girl in the butt, and not all gay men have anal sex. It is not a homosexual construct.

 

In this article(sited below) It further goes on to say that people when interpreting the bible falsely assume that anal sex would be considered dirty by God considering he made us, including the system we use to poop with. By this logic we should not use the penis to have sex with because men pee out of it. I assure you it is quite easy to have anal sex with out it being messy.

 

I do not believe that sex was ever intended by God, just for procreation if so there are a lot of you fifty somethings that need to quit it and Viagra for you is a sin!

 

I am really interested in hearing what you non-anal sexers have to say about this.

 

http://www.sexinchrist.com/

 

{'color':'red'}

 

User Comments

{#im-gonna-be-sick.gif} that's all I have to say. LOL

you know you want some butt sex mary :)

Interesting blog, but I doubt many Christians will contest what you're saying - not even the more conservative ones.  I think the current culture war (the one involving homosexuality) has pretty much buried the debate on "appropriate" sex in a heterosexual relationship.  Still, you raise a good point, what exactly is "sodomy"?  My Webster's defines it as "unusual sexual intercourse", wtf?!  So I guess, given that definition, there may be a few ultra-cons out there who believe that any non-vaginal intercourse is sodomy.  Still, for those who are okay with oral and anal sex, where is the line?  What exactly constitutes "unusual"?  Is it okay if my wife hogties me from the ceiling, performs anal sex on me with a strap-on, and slaps my junk around while watching Hannity?... Aaaanyway, another interesting point to be made in all this is the idea that many Christian girls seem to think that giving up their "black cherry" is a virginity "loophole" (pardon the expression, couldn't resist XD).

"Some guy trying to talk women into premarital sex that was "not sex"."

It's more likely than you think...

Okay, so that article isn't mainly about anal sex, but it was the best one I could find regarding the increase in teens performing anal sex as a way to maintain their "virginity".

BTW. I will say I doubt many conservative Christians practice anal sex, and I have to wonder if many are aware of the reasons that anal sex is appealing.

I know several reasons why anal sex is a appealing psychologically...however you are very wrong about doubting if conservative Christians practice it. I know from experience most do.

Wouldn't that mean you're kind of preaching to the choir here? :P

Psychologically appealing?  I was actually thinking it was more a physiological thing, but of course I'm a guy, so I'm more inclined to either find certain other acts more psychological or just not take that element into account at all.

i actually asked a priest and pastor that question...the answer was the same...between married couples, anyhting they agree on to do is ok....no matter what it is.....if one isnt into it though then it becomes a sin..so god says: Do what You Like ...

 

I am curious where it says  that if one isn't is not it............

i asked where it was in the bible as well....they coined it as healthy marraige activity...

{#flag.gif}{#popc1.gif}

can I share :P

Long time since I came to "Blogster". No Holly, there is no "Biblical reference against sodomy". Except where a man raped a man or something. Actually, there isn't "one single" reference about how a "committed couple' should have sex. I studied the Bible 8 years or so..  Someone says different, direct them to me. I am "coincutter on Greasy.com". I won't be posting here.

Actually the word sodomy is NOT in the bible at all. There are no references to anal sex either.  Arguable there are references to homosexuality and the two are not the same thing.

It is a shame you do not  post here

Different anon here (from earlier reply in blog, about conservatives and such), I would guess any negative implications associated with acts of so-called "sodomy" are probably more associated with the Biblical city of Sodom than with homosexuality.  Granted it seems strongly implied that gay sex was one of the "sinful acts" that took place there, but there's also some implication that other things were going on that fall under the blanket term "sexual debauchery".  Pedophilia, orgies, watersports, scat, and possibly bondage (disclaimer: acts are listed in likelihood given the time period, also I'm in no way attempting to lump all these acts together as equal/comparable - obviously certain acts are illegal for a reason), who really knows what possible things to which those passages are referring.  So I guess some people feel they're just playing it safe by only doing it in the vaj.  I guess a very Catholic reasoning for not practicing anal sex could be that, as you mentioned, it's not a procreative act, which is believed to be sinful based on the story of Onan in Genesis.  I would argue by that logic that eunuchs or men without sperm or women without eggs would therefore also be prohibited from having sex, since the act would have no possibility of producing a child, but then again the verse specifically states "spilling it [his seed] on the ground" so, if there is no seed to be spilled, one could technically argue the act is not sinful.  Dilemmas, dilemmas - it's these things that make me glad I'm an infidel. XD

This is a random blog. LoL. I can see what you mean though. Good point but very random subject! Haha

Should I be anything other than random? Actually, i would  not agree.  It is about me :)

That's true. Just a crazy blog! LoL. Makes ppl wanna come back for more. Can't wait for ur next one. heh

WOW......I didn't even know anal sex, and sin in the same context event entered people's minds. The title gave me a nice chuckle {#flag.gif}

Yes, it seems people do worry an awful lot about what goes on in others bedrooms

What two adults (or whatever) do to or with each other with mutual consent is nobody's business anyhow .Personally I have never had anal sex with a woman who was not the initiator or expressed the desire to do so before we even got to bed or wherever we were. It's my opinion that if God made it he wants you to use it. Not to mention the fact that, at least for me, orgasms are different from place to place and that seems to hold true for my partner as well. I am an old man and have had the good fortune to have made wonderful love all over the civilized world and I can truthfully say that a very large number of women can have an orgasm during any sex act. All I can say about that is lucky them.

{#apploud.gif}{#apploud.gif}{#apploud.gif}{#apploud.gif}{#apploud.gif}{#apploud.gif}

Even though I am an ordained deacon, and a college professor, I am still A MAN, and 100% agree with most all of the articles in your reference site !!!

After going AWOL from blogster, (finals, moving to a new apartment, redirecting mail, and setting up the comp) had to catch up with my fave blogster gal and provide you with this excerpt regarding this blog from the King James Version Exodus 20:17.  The Tenth Commandment.  "Thou shalt not covet they neighbor's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbor's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ASS {#violet_wink.gif}, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's."

I am open to any and all interpretations regarding this verse BUTT it's pretty clear what the bible says about it.  Thanks for the blog.  Oh, and I bid farewell to the ultimate sinner in your life and hope he is enjoying his life in hell - FRED.  May he finally rest in Piece. 

LOL!  That was priceless!  Fantasic!  You are missed and glad you are back after all that busy time away!

A question to ponder, according to the Bible - to covet HIS ass is a SIN, but to covet (defined as: to feel blameworthy desire for or to wish for excessively and longingly) HER ASS is NOT ?! (yay!).  So, Covet all you want Holly as long as it is not against HIS ass.

Which then begs the question what distance is covered defining the term neighbour?  next door?, next block or neighbouring city? or state?  Because anyone outside the term "neighbour" boundaries (he or she) will be exempt from this sin.  And don't be naive to think that ASS means donkey especially when we are this close to getting to the BOTTOM of this debate...LOL.

you need to add eddie murphy's boogie in da butt....awesome song its on my playlist

hehehehehe

Post A Comment