Welcome to Blogster!
870,551 Blogster Users  |  364,642 Posts



Blog Traffic: 1703060

Posts: 14079

My Comments: 17491

User Comments: 46506

Photos: 16304

Friends: 487

Following: 84

Followers: 65

Points: 235253

Last Online: 10 hours ago



No Recent Visitors

Muslims won't fly with unclean animals. Dogs are considered unclean animals.

Added: Wednesday, August 11th 2010 at 3:27pm by feralpuppies
Related Tags: politics
Q. Where did Obama recently tell America to vacation?
A.  The Gulf Coast.
Q.  Where did Obama and his family go on vacation?
A.  Maine. For two days.
Q.  How did they get to Maine?
A.  They flew on Air Force One.
Q.  How did their dog Bo, the Portuguese water dog, get to Maine?
A.  On a separate smaller jet aircraft at the expense of the American taxpayer.
Q.  Why didn't Bo just stay at the White House for two days?
A.  The children would miss him too terribly much.
Q.  Why didn't Bo fly on Air Force One?
A.  Muslims won't fly with unclean animals.  Dogs are considered unclean animals.
Q.  When will we stop the madness?
"US. Air Force - Travel Agents To Allah"
"Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But the U.S. ARMED FORCES don't have that problem." .... Ronald Reagan


-----Original Message-----
From: "Carol Throne" <cjt1941@bellsouth.net>

User Comments

Say what? That makes no sense; the prohibition on "unclean animals" is for dietary purposes. They're not gonna eat the dog, it's a companion animal, which IS allowed in Islam, according to what I've found on Google.

While I certainly DO have a problem with shipping pets around at taxpayer expense, that sounds like a lot of horse-pucky invented by some idiot who didn't even have the sense to research what he's talking about before writing it.

Is someone mass-mailing this garbage?



The origins of practices in relation to "clean animals" and "unclean animals" are lost to prehistory, but are maintained by several large religions. The idea that some animals are dangerous or disgusting is present in almost all known human cultures. This could be due to the fact that in ancient times people had not realized how to preserve and prepare some foods. For instance, pork not prepared or stored properly can cause illness, as can some seafood. Pigs are also common vectors in transmission of the flu to humans from birds since they are immunologically similar to humans. By labeling the animal as unclean and forbidden, consumption and handling of those potentially dangerous foods would not occur.

I'm not seeing any contradiction with what I said. The unclean animals prohibition in Islam is in regards to those animals for consumption, not companion animals. If they WERE prohibited for companionship based on their unclean status, then why does Obama... who is supposedly a secret Muslim... own a companion dog? Why would he keep it as a companion, but not fly with it? This is ridiculous.

I understand the entire concept of unclean animals. I grew up on the Bible and realize that many religions still practice that today. The point here is that this article makes no sense whatsoever, and appears to be relying on the reader's ignorance of what the "unclean" label is all about.



I suggest you read this. As we are in a war against Muslim extremists it is important to understand that Muslims are permitted to lie during a war. IF Obama is Muslim could the owning of a dog be a lie to cause some to question his possibly being a Muslim?


Which basically means that he's allowed to break other mandates of Allah to lie? There's nothing in your link that suggests that. I mean, think about what you're saying: According to your logic, any Muslim can break any commandment of Allah at any time, as long as it's a lie to further this battle.

I don't think any good Muslim believes that anymore than any good Christian feels that murdering people of any other religion is fine just because God once told a prophet to wipe out every last man who worshiped another god.

There's lying, then there's blasphemy.

Read the FIRST sentence again.

InsideP,,the dog,Bo,was a gift from Sen Kennedy who has them too...and the American public loves dogs,so the Obamas really had no choice but to get one.They waited ,then Kennedy had to train them on what the USA wants to see in his image,a pet!



He's an illegal muslim,,you really need to study who this man is.Who knows Bo the dog might just be in Kennedys name too and not the Obamas!Think about that,BO is a muslim and he can't hide that.

Nota look who gave them the dog! Told IP above that Bo could still be in the Kennedys name ,so the O's don't show they own a dog.They never wanted one,,took them forever so Kennedy did it for them!gez!


Yep, and you rarely see them with the dog...I bet WE THE PEOPLE pay for a dog walker as well...

Yes we pay,it's Reggie Loves responsibility,he flew with Bo! There is a pic showing Reggie and Bo and the jet,,,poor Bo!,,hum wonder if BO is for barack obama?lol,of course what an ego!

Most people insidepass do break the commandments of their religions at times,probably all have.This MrO is no exception,and yes he's muslim and not a good one either.And they do not find dogs appealing at all the muslims .

I read it, and read the accompanying article in its entirety. Nowhere in that article does it suggest that Muslims are allowed to commit blasphemy to further a lie. The same system of degrees exists in our own religion and our legal system. You can lie all you want until that lie becomes slander.

That -still- makes no sense. Why wouldn't they simply leave the dog at home if they don't want it around themselves or their children? You're suggesting a level of duplicity that is stupid, not even remotely cunning.

That's right, people do break the commandments all the time. They're generally either politicians who are simply talking the religious talk to impress the most stupid members of the religious flock or they're extremists who can rationalize -anything- away.

Now it must be said, that lying is forbidden in Islam, however so, UNDER 3 OCCASIONS, it is not. This point must be made crystal clear, that it is only under 3 specific circumstances in which a Muslim is allowed to lie, not like the Christian tries to make it seem, that Muslims are always allowed to lie.


These three specific circumstances are as follows:


Sahih MuslimBook 032, Number 6303:


Humaid b. 'Abd al-Rahman b. 'Auf reported that his mother Umm Kulthum daughter of 'Uqba b. Abu Mu'ait, and she was one amongst the first emigrants who pledged allegiance to Allah's Apostle (may peace be upon him), as saying that she heard Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) as saying: A liar is not one who tries to bring reconciliation amongst people and speaks good (in order to avert dispute), or he conveys good. Ibn Shihab said he did not hear that exemption was granted in anything what the people speak as lie but in three cases: in battle, for bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the husband to his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband (in a twisted form in order to bring reconciliation between them).


So as you can see, Muslims are allowed to only lie during battle, essentially in war. Muslims are allowed to lie in order to bring peace between two people, and also when a wife and husband are fighting with each other and they lie to bring about an end to their problems.

  Now considering that EXTREMISTS think that they are at war with us everywhere....they will lie about how they feel about the US even if they live here.

I wonder how much HE is paid and who pays him....after all Miss Spain/Louise Antoinette said the family was paying their personal expenses themselves.....I would definitely consider THAT a "personal expense"! The JET for Bo and Love to travel in as well!

When I traveled with my animals I had to pay for all MY animals after all!

The problem with that whole line of discussion is that it's typically used as an indictment of -all- Muslims, proof that none of them can be trusted. After all, we KNOW that the extremists will lie and say whatever they need to say to conceal themselves. You can't tell them apart from everyone else unless they're the obvious ones screaming in rage on the streets.

There are people who want it to be easy; simply identify someone as a Muslim, and therefore, they are the enemy. Any suggestion that they are peaceful is simply a lie being told "in war" since they're supposedly all at war with us all the time. The Muslim woman doing her shopping, whose never done a thing against anyone else, simply been a part of the community? Doesn't mean a thing. She's just waiting for an opportunity to suicide bomb you. Those kids in two? Just waiting to get hold of a gun to go jihad on you. The peaceful life they live is just a lie. You don't worship as they do. You will die for it. It makes everything easier, because there are no innocents if something unfortunate were to happen to them.

That mentality is what some people push for, and it is entirely wrong. It's not that easy, and it never will be that easy. Taking that way out is the easy path, and it's the path straight to hell and damnation. Literal, if you prefer that to the spiritual.

Is that what you believe? I doubt it, but you're pushing very hard for me to buy into something that is the next step to a means of casting -all- Muslims to a similar mold. I don't and won't buy into it.

What purpose does it serve me to tell me that extremists lie? I already know that. These people are scumbags. They'll lie to their own people, disseminate any dirty spew that furthers their cause of murder and hate. Lives mean nothing to them, their own or others, much less the enemy. Do you think this changes anything?

What's the point?

I hope the forest never falls on you , but since you can't see it for the trees...good luck!

The only way the forest is going to fall on me is if someone decides to bomb it rather than cutting out the deadwood.

Good luck on your own view.

LOL! Have you looked at our parks recently....Fire is more likely to take the forests out....

IP, what makes you think that some Muslims don't go by the Koran that teaches that all infidels should die. All Muslims are our enemy, if they don't kill, they support them who do. We are the Great Satan to them.

Find a muslim and they'll tell you what they think of animals IP,its on the net too.

-Some- Muslims do, sure. I'm not questioning that at all. What I am questioning is that all Muslims are the enemy, that all of them support those that do want to kill us. I find that as ridiculous as the suggestion that because some Christians believe they are the second coming of Jesus and rape children, that all the rest are secret supporters of those extremist nutjobs and lying about it.

Honestly, if you really believe that, then why aren't you out there killing them? I mean this seriously: You say that every last Muslim man, woman and child is a supporter of those who want to kill us and therefore deserve to die. Where's your gun? Afraid that God's not backing you?

The dog flew on a separate Jet plane. 

GASP!  You mean.... *only* Muslims lie during a war?  No other group?  Good American Christians are totally up-front and honest about their every single thought word and deed during combat?


His Muslim is showing now!And Obama thinks we don't see or read either I bet,.

If we dipped our bullets in pig blood, the Muslims would avoid us.


Those of us around the FMA for a while may have heard of the story of Gen. Pershing putting down the Moro insurrection/indpendence movement in the southern Philippines in the early 1900s by burying Moros with pigs.  It is sometimes mentioned as a possible tactic in WW3.


Thanks to Jeff Finder for bringing this Snopes entry to my attention.



Crafty Dog






Claim:   General John J. Pershing effectively discouraged Muslim terrorists in the Philippines by killing them and burying their bodies with pigs.

HOW TO STOP ISLAMIC TERRORISTS . . . it worked once in our History . . . 

Once in US history an episode of Islamic terrorism was very quickly stopped. It happened in the Philippines about 1911, when Gen. John J. Pershing was in command of the garrison. There had been numerous Islamic terrorist attacks, so "Black Jack" told his boys to catch the perps and teach them a lesson. 


Forced to dig their own graves, the terrorists were all tied to posts, execution style. The US soldiers then brought in pigs and slaughtered them, rubbing their bullets in the blood and fat. Thus, the terrorists were terrorized; they saw that they would be contaminated with hogs' blood. This would mean that they could not enter Heaven, even if they died as terrorist martyrs. 


All but one was shot, their bodies dumped into the grave, and the hog guts dumped atop the bodies. The lone survivor was allowed to escape back to the terrorist camp and tell his brethren what happened to the others. This brought a stop to terrorism in the Philippines for the next 50 years. 


Pointing a gun into the face of Islamic terrorists won't make them flinch. They welcome the chance to die for Allah. Like Gen. Pershing, we must show them that they won't get to Muslim heaven (which they believe has an endless supply of virgins) but instead will die with the hated pigs of the devil. 






Subject: How to end the war quickly if you have absolutely no respect for pigs! 


An Israeli friend recently informed me that the UK fought the Islamic terrorist attacks by burying the criminals with a pig. Apparently the Islamic belief is that if ones' body is buried with a pig (because they are considered unclean) their soul will go to hell. I did a little research into this subject matter and found it to be true. This got me thinking. 


If we put a baby pig on every airline flight then all suicide terrorists would abort their missions as they would not want their souls to go to hell. Additionally, if we drop shipped, oh say, 100,000 pigs into Afghanistan I think our recon and assault efforts may be more successful. Apparently Muslims dislike the very sight of pigs A LOT! 


They are also adamantly opposed to alcohol, thus we spike their water supply with a few thousand gallons of moonshine, get them drunk and turn the pigs loose. The war would be over in a weekend. 



And besides I would not trust a Muslim anywhere near my Dogs
I would NOT fly with a Muslim...They are unclean..Dogs are much cleaner, I sleep with my dogs

Hilarious, I would rather asking your dog first if he can stand a racist's smell! 

No offence dude, but it seems you guys are so pathetic believing the media without having any brains to understand first.

As Fox says, I report, you decide.

Obama is Muslim.

This is purely scam, dear blog writer get your self a life and stop making shit out of no where!

It is allowed to keep raise dogs in Islam, I am a Muslim and I know what I am saying.

Second how would he forget his dog if he is celebrity leaving it behind, and do you have any evidence rather than copying and pasting unsolicited articles!

Post A Comment

This user has disabled anonymous commenting.