Could the Obama Administration be Blocking Gulf Clean-up Efforts Intentionally?
Impeach Obama Exclusive: Could the Obama Administration be Blocking Gulf Clean-up Efforts Intentionally?
By Floyd and Mary Beth Brown
At first blush this sounds like an outlandish question with a conspiratorial twist. The corollary question goes like this: Is the Obama administration intentionally scaling back clean-up efforts in the Gulf in an attempt to maximize the damage so Democrats in Congress will have an excuse to take effective control over yet another major sector of our economy and impose crippling and draconian new taxes on the American people?
We first learned of this controversy reading Sher Zieve who wrote in the Canada Free Press: “Obama is doing the bare minimum so that destruction will be at an all-time maximum — in order to shove his Cap and Trade bill (which will complete our destruction) down our throats.”
Zieve added: “The BP oil disaster was custom-made for The Obama… The effective oil-skimmer systems utilized by the Saudis and others would work to greatly minimize the damage being caused to the US Gulf Coast. But, The Obama continues to drag his heels as States and lives are destroyed.”
Fox News reported that when the Dutch government offered to help us clean up the oil spewing from the leaking BP oil rig, Obama initially turned them down cold. Norwegian and Dutch firms offered to help us too, but Obama said no.
It is reputed that the Roman Emperor Nero played his fiddle while Rome burnt to the ground so he could falsely blame the disaster on Christians and thereby rationalize a campaign of persecution against them.
Is it possible that Barack Hussein Obama and statists on Capitol Hill are using this crisis as an excuse to drive prices up at the pump, drive your utility bills through the roof, regulate your behavior and diminish your standard of living in this already queasy economy?
This much is certain — in spite of what Obama told the American people during his Oval Office address to the nation, he did not adequately respond to this crisis. The administration has clearly failed in terms of organization and the use of resources available to the federal government.
Moreover, it’s now indisputable that statists on Capitol Hill are attempting to exploit this disaster to push so-called cap and trade legislation. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell recently revealed: “At the same time as Americans wonder when this gusher will ever be plugged, we hear word that the administration and my good friend the majority leader want to piggy back their controversial new national energy tax — also known as cap and trade — to an oil spill response bill that could and should be an opportunity for true bipartisan cooperation. So here again, we see the administration using a crisis, in this case the disaster in the gulf, as an opportunity to muscle through Congress another deeply unpopular bill that has profound implications for small business and struggling households.”
But why let something as trivial as the truth get in the way when it comes to pushing an extreme “green” agenda? Liberals like Barack Obama made this problem worse so they could “solve” the problem and, as we’ve come to expect, they plan to “solve” the problem by making it worse.
So, true to form, Obama declared a moratorium on off-shore drilling and to make matters worse, Obama wants to institute a massive new energy tax, masquerading as sound energy policy (so-called cap and trade), that will dramatically raise the cost of just about everything you produce or consume, deprive you of income, control your behavior and repress your liberties.
Obama’s Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, once said that you should never let a good crisis go to waste and Barack Obama and Democrats on Capitol Hill aren’t about to let this crisis go to waste. He may pontificate about holding BP to account but Obama and his leftist cronies fully intend to exploit this crisis to sneak liberty-stealing cap and trade legislation past the American people.
User Comments
|
|
P.S. The skimmers don't work for sh*t. 1100 Barrels collected over a 24 hour period . Sperm whales are swallowing more...The boat, uses more...
|
Politicians always exploit disasters and tragedies to their own advantage - post 9/11 usage of terrorism as a buzzword is a perfect example. It doesn't mean there's a conspiracy afoot. |
![]() |
The Socialist agenda is to have open borders and a N. American Union. The currency will have the name 'Amero'. |
So disingenous to cry about the deficit when GOP took us from surplus to deficit...But hey, heres some ideas. Let the Bush Tax cuts for the top 1% expire. Lookie what that would do.. .
|
BP is only allowed to drill where the Obama administration approves for them to drill. At least according to the "World Socialist Web Site".
According to a study carried out by McClatchy Newspapers, since the beginning of June, the Minerals Management Service has approved five offshore drilling projects for the Gulf of Mexico. In three of these cases, the MMS agreed to waivers, or “categorical exclusions,” which allow the oil companies preparing to drill in the Gulf to avoid undergoing detailed environmental safety reviews. The MMS granted the same waiver to BP’s Deepwater Horizon project prior to the oil spill. Overall, 198 deepwater leases have been approved by the MMS for the Gulf of Mexico since April 20. Ten of these leases were sold to BP. This gift to the oil companies, including the very company responsible for the worst environmental disaster in US history, exposes the real relationship between the administration and the oil giants. World Socialist Web Site
|
MMS has had problems for years, nothing but oil cronys and the like. Unfortunately, they didn't overhall and kick out the Bushie oil sucks in time. But, this land was leased back in 2009, drilling started in Feb . But there have been lots of reports regarding problems with the MMS. I brought it up before the disaster. For their orgies and Methamphetamine habits, in October of 2008. http://www.blogster.com/ekyprogressive/snorting-meth-of-a-toaster-oven-121008050311 But everyone else was SHOCKED that something like this would ever happen. Not shocked enough to support a moratorium on drilling, heaven forbid, because there are so many ships to spare for cleanup should another go boom. Visiting the world socialist website? That is surprising to me. I only caught their articles through newsletters I get from informationclearinghouse. But they send you news from all over the world, and some of it you have to really keep a skeptical eye. But MMS needs seriously redone, you will get no argument on that from me. I've been saying so a while now. Thanks for catching up.
|
Did you catch the whopper BP told ? In the 77 days since oil from the ruptured Deepwater Horizon began to gush into the Gulf of Mexico, BP has skimmed or burned about 60 percent of the amount it promised regulators it could remove in a single day. The disparity between what BP promised in its March 24 filing with federal regulators and the amount of oil recovered since the April 20 explosion underscores what some officials and environmental groups call a misleading numbers game that has led to widespread confusion about the extent of the spill and the progress of the recovery. "It's clear they overreached," said John F. Young Jr., council chairman in Louisiana's Jefferson Parish. "I think the federal government should have at the very least picked up a phone and started asking some questions and challenged them about the accuracy of that number and tested the veracity of that claim." In a March report that was not questioned by federal officials, BP said it had the capacity to skim and remove 491,721 barrels of oil each day in the event of a major spill. As of Monday, with about 2 million barrels released into the gulf, the skimming operations that were touted as key to preventing environmental disaster have averaged less than 900 barrels a day . Skimming has captured only 67,143 barrels, and BP has relied on burning to remove 238,095 barrels. Most of the oil recovered -- about 632,410 barrels -- was captured directly at the site of the leaking well. BP officials declined to comment on the validity of early skimming projections, stressing instead the company's commitment to building relief wells intended to shut down the still-gushing well. "The numbers are what they are," said BP spokesman Toby Odone . "At some point, we will look back and say why the numbers ended up this way. That's for the future. Right now, we are doing all we can to capture and collect the oil through various methods. We will make sure all the oil is ultimately dealt with."... MORE Real sweethearts aren't they...They are who we need to be upset at. No plan, no money spent on R&D for these disasters, and NO regard at all for what is happening, and they are not even shy about it. |
I do remember McCain and Obama making a really big deal of BEING THERE for the vote, yes. They had to take time out of their busy campaigns to vote YES. (Both of the dumbasses). Hey Eky, when on of those big windmills falls on someone and KILLS THEM, I will remember that....then we will have to get rid of them all. Plus they are BUTT-UGLY. They line the Columbia River Gorge and they kill birds. But we'll have to get rid of them when they kill someone, right? HELLO!!! UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION IS NOT "JOBS"!!!! (Who are you Botox-braindead Nancy Pelosi?) It's simply money out of our pockets. People want real JOBS. Not a stinking handout. I think you are racist against ARIZONANS. Both white and Hispanic AMERICANS want the illegals GONE! They want the border, which is their back yards, SAFE! They want the law ENFORCED. Whether it is Federal Law or AZ law, who the Hell cares. As long as it is enforced. Obama doesn't give a damn how many more die there. He wants more Mexican/Dem voters. And if more die on the border it's no skin off his nose, because he has an "agenda". I was just checking stats: The FBI doesn't patrol the Border, DO THEY? Only big cities. And the New York Times flat-out lied about the stats. Read the article. http://www.nctimes.com/app/blogs/wp/?p=9515
|
Wind Turbines DO NOT KILL BIRDS . Stop pushin that lie...
|
Unemployment compensation that was earned by workers who lost their jobs through no fault of their own, puts money into the hands of those who will spend it out of need, stimulating the economy by increasing demand. "I think you are racist against ARIZONANS." Why, because I bring up that it was written with the assistance of white supremists? Or that I say it is racist? You think lots of whites are going to get asked for their "papers"? Puhlease. It's racist, and Arizona is a tea-bagger haven, and as we know that movement is quite racist in its nature, as are the "birther" conspiracies. But its always the "Im rubber youre glue" defense that is played. Play the victim, claiming that to try (unsuccessfully) to give the illusion of being unable to victimize, hoping people will ignore that the movement is pushing blatantly racist messages. Sorry, it is what it is. Oh lookie, more stimulus funds to my RED state. http://www.wkyt.com/wymtnews/headlines/97889939.html
|
Yes they do kill birds: http://science.howstuffworks.com/wind-turbine-kill-birds.htm Same page: /* <![CDATA[ */ (function() {var playerId=swfobject.getQueryParamValue("playerId"),flashVars={_playMode:'paused',_adCode:'science.howstuffworks.com/preempt/ros/science/earthscience/green_science/wind-turbine-kill-birds.htm',_myURL:'science.howstuffworks.com/wind-turbine-kill-birds.htm',referenceId:'6196-title',_configXML:'http://static.howstuffworks.com/flash/embeddedPlayerConfig.xml',playerId:(playerId?playerId:'1559540596'),_actionSourceSwfUrl:'http://static.howstuffworks.com/flash/OmnitureActionSource.swf',_omnitureSuiteFromPage:'hswprod'},params={wmode:"transparent",allowScriptAccess:"always"};swfobject.embedSWF('http://static.howstuffworks.com/flash/rollEmbeddedPlayer7.swf','videoPlayerId','400','330','8.0.0.0','http://static.howstuffworks.com/flash/expressInstall.swf',flashVars,params);})(); /* ]]> */ Energy: Wind Power Wind power plants generate no pollutants, but will not make electricity when the wind is not blowing fast enough. (April, 2008)So wind turbines DO indeed kill birds and if the wind doesn't blow fast enough, they don't generate energy. I suggest we have all of the illegals BLOW. Either that, or the liberals....(same diff. ) |
No it never was a fascist state. It's a Republic. WITH LAWS. It's the damned Fed who has NOT enforced the law for 40 years.
|
No, us real americans and Obama's DOJ isn't going to let it, no matter how hard you try with the aid of white supremists. |
Please review the science (especially the updated science) on what is going on with wind, solar and biofuel technologies. |
You never answered my question, eky. Is it "racist" if a Mexican cop wants to see my papers in Mexico????? |
Ok James, I am sincerely asking you a question: How and when has/did Obama pulled us out of an economic spiral? I truly would like to know this. |
You mean good ol' boys like this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mN67KJdd6MOne of the Black Panthers SWEET! |
![]() |
If the police stop you, you must show your drivers lisc. The police want ID, nothing wrong with that. If you are breaking a law, you should be charged. |
I don't know James because Obama has run up more national debt than any other President ever. Kind of scary! |
White supremicist?????? Get real. The new "white supremecist" is BLACK! You mean good ol' boys like this? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mN67KJdd6MOne of the Black Panthers
|
As I said above ... "But its always the "Im rubber youre glue" defense that is played. Play the victim, claiming that to try (unsuccessfully) to give the illusion of being unable to victimize, hoping people will ignore that the movement is pushing blatantly racist messages." When stuff like this comes from the right, The truth is glaring..
Behold! The Tea Party and Right today....But Racist...Why would one ever.. Stop pretending and be honest about it, Arizona don't like the browns and the tea-baggers don't want a black man in the white house, and thusly will find fault with EVERYTHING. It is what it is. |
Show me some white supremists doing something bad...Man...That speaks volumes. Thanks for the chuckle. I love it when honesty breaks through. |
Started to do an assignment in NM, but it is so far from my family, that I didn't want to do that (and I am not comfortable with the thought of flying.) |
First...The panther story is Hype, and conservative race baiting. http://mediamatters.org/research/201007070020 Manufactured scandal: Right wing's phony allegations against the Justice Department July 07, 2010 11:13 am ET — 57 CommentsJ. Christian Adams' accusations that President Obama's Justice Department engaged in racially charged "corruption" in the New Black Panther Party case do not stand up to the evidence. Adams is a right-wing activist tied to the Bush-era politicization of the Justice Department who has admitted he lacks first-hand knowledge of the events he is discussing, and his claims fall apart given the fact that the Obama DOJ obtained judgment against one defendant, while the Bush DOJ declined to pursue similar allegations in 2006. Adams : DOJ's action in New Black Panther case shows unprecedented, racially charged corruptionAdams: DOJ decision not to pursue charges in New Black Panthers case demonstrates unprecedented, racially charged corruption. GOP activist J. Christian Adams penned a Washington Times column leveling accusations of a "corrupt" and racially charged dismissal of the New Black Panther Party case and appeared in a two-part interview with Fox News' Megyn Kelly. During the interview, Adams accused the Justice Department of "a hostility in the voting section and in the civil rights division to bringing cases on behalf of white victims for the benefit of national racial minorities." Adams further said that "the decision to dismiss this case was corrupt," adding, "to abandon law-abiding citizens and abet wrongdoers constitutes corruption." In a Pajamas Media post, Adams wrote : If we had that frank, truthful discussion about race, we'd learn that the Obama administration doesn't believe some civil rights laws protect every American. The Bush Civil Rights Division was willing to protect all Americans from racial discrimination; during the Obama years, the Holder years, only some Americans will be protected. Americans have a right to know and judge the racial policies of the administration they elected in 2008. Adams' unsubstantiated story spread throughout other right-wing media. Kelly brought the story to Hannity , and it was picked up by Rush Limbaugh , Laura Ingraham , radio host Jay Severin , the blogs Hot Air , Atlas Shrugs , Ace of Spades , Andrew Breitbart's Big Government , and the Fox website Fox Nation . Reality: Adams' accusations don't stand up to the facts Adams is a long-time right-wing activist, who is known for filing an ethics complaint against Hugh Rodham that was subsequently dismissed, served as a Bush poll watcher in Florida 2004, and reportedly volunteered for a Republican group that trains lawyers to fight "racially tinged battles over voting rights"; Adams was hired to the Justice Department in 2005 by Bradley Schlozman, who was found by the Department of Justice Inspector General and Office of Professional Responsibility to have improperly considered political affiliation when hiring career attorneys -- the former head of the DOJ voting rights section reportedly said that Adams was "exhibit A of the type of people hired by Schlozman"; Adams has admitted that he does not have first-hand knowledge of the events, conversations, and decisions that he is citing to advance his accusations; The Bush administration's Justice Department -- not the Obama administration -- made the decision not to pursue criminal charges against members of the New Black Panther Party for alleged voter intimidation at a polling center in Philadelphia in 2008; The Obama administration successfully obtained default judgment against Samir Shabazz, a member of the New Black Panther Party carrying a nightstick outside the Philadelphia polling center on Election Day 2008; The Bush administration DOJ chose not to pursue similar charges against members of the Minutemen, one of whom allegedly carried a weapon while harassing Hispanic voters in Arizona in 2006; No voters have come forward to claim that they were intimidated from voting on account of the New Black Panthers standing outside the polling center in 2008; The Republican vice chairwoman of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, which is currently investigating the Justice Department's decision, has called that investigation "very small potatoes" full of "overheated rhetoric filled with insinuations and unsubstantiated charges," and said it has not "served the interests of the commission"; she further said that DOJ has given a "plausible argument" for not pursuing additional charges in the case.
And two: "Show me a white supremist doing something Bad" |
Crime is actually reducing , at the borders... ....But the impending debate comes amid newly released FBI statistics that show low levels and an overall decline in instances of violence and crime in major border-region cities. The numbers, released by the FBI before the Memorial Day recess, show that Phoenix, San Diego and El Paso, Texas, all have some of the lowest rates of violent crime compared to other cities throughout the United States. Between 2008 and 2009 instances of violent crime in Phoenix dropped by more than 16 percent and the number of murders decreased by more than 17 percent. Violent crime in San Diego dropped by nearly 2 percent and murders fell by more than 25 percent. In El Paso, levels of violent crime remained the same, but the number of murders dropped by nearly 30 percent, according to the FBI’s latest statistics. Nationwide, violent crime decreased by about 5 percent last year. Violent crimes within counties that run along the Mexican border have seen a 30 percent decrease over the past 20 years and remain some of the lowest rates in America....more |
Maybe their figures aren't correct. I just know from talking to relatives and what they are seeing day in and day out on their local news stations live. Also seeing things happen by living there. |
Eky, These must be Democrat racism in action, RIGHT?
I'll bet you're not defending Condi against "racism" now are you....?
This link shows many photos, eky,....are they racist? http://www.zombietime.com/zomblog/?p=612 Or how about this?
What about all of the pictures on that page of Bush using the "F" word? And you STILL haven't shown me any "white supremacists" tea partiers in action. Then you used the "tea-bagger" nasty word to refer to your fellow American citizens who happen to be conservatives. Naughty naughty, and "racist"? "Sexist"?
So who is "the RACIST"????? Dem or Rep.? I think it's still the Democrats, hands down, who are STILL the biggest racists in the world. We catch them in videos all over the country. Racism AGAINST whites. |
There is nothing phony about it, the tea-bagger movement is a racist movement, they have no concern for minority issues, except for trying to "take their country back" which in reality means "From that black man". See the photos above, many of which came from tea bag leaders. Its not what I THINK conservatives are. Its what they PROVE they are, time and time again. Republicans/tea-baggers, synonyms. Not a penny's worth difference between the two. "It's the selling out of the American dream and her people that sucks the worst. You're too young to understand what this country has lost." Am I too young to understand, or are you too old to shake the concept of "white entitlement"? Either way, Ad Hominem attacks don't prove your or any other baggers point. It just makes you look like a whiney ass titty baby. Focus please, drop the logical fallacies. Interesting tidbits I picked up today... The Fox Cycle: From bogus right-wing attack to mainstream news Bush DOJ Decided New Black Panthers Case "No big deal".
|
Hey Holly, you didn't call me back last night! Yep, there are racist of all colors. But there seems to be quite the epidemic in today's so called tea-party movement. Bachmann demonstates how it works. They like to play the perpetual victims of reverse racism, hoping it will draw attention away from the fact that their preferred groups (the tea party, the Arizona law, etc. Interesting tidbits... Hate groups donate to defense of Arizona Law. Larry Flint to David Vitter: Donate your diapers to the Gulf cleanup ...LMFAO Bachmann calls for constitutional conservative takeover to free ‘nation of slaves’
|
No, I call a spade a spade. It just is what it is, and I support my claims with proof. Unlike of course, ALL conservatives.You seen the pictures planted in our media by tea party leaders, I seen the stand selling "yep Im a racist " tea-shirts for a local Tea party event (most don't even try to hide it, why do you...Oh wait! "SHOW ME SOME "WHITE SUPREMECISTS" doing something bad!!!!"...Nevermind). It is what it is, I can accept reality, can you? |
The tee shirts were a response to the accusations , eky! NOT an admission. You are deliberately being obtuse, but then that is exactly what I have learned expect from you.
|
Obama=an anti American muslim! |
Ok either you think he's Muslim or you think he went to a church with a preacher you don't like. Pick one and stick to it, for Christ's sake...
|
![]() |
http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=tCAffMSWSzY#t=28
He has always been a Muslim but switched to Christian in ill. for political expediency. Michelle insisted. He hasn't found a Christian church in DC to his liking, but he does go into a Muslim mosque when convenient. |
| Avertible catastrophe
Three days after the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico began on April 20, the Netherlands offered the U.S. government ships equipped to handle a major spill, one much larger than the BP spill that then appeared to be underway. "Our system can handle 400 cubic metres per hour," Weird Koops, the chairman of Spill Response Group Holland, told Radio Netherlands Worldwide, giving each Dutch ship more cleanup capacity than all the ships that the U.S. was then employing in the Gulf to combat the spill. Read more: http://www.financialpost.com/Avertible+catastrophe/3203808/story.html |
![]() |
Obama wouldn't suspend the Jones Law so foreign ships could come in to US waters to help with the oil spill, bowing to the Unions. Obama didn't worry as he played golf. He is the new worst President. |
He ranks number 15 by the ones who pay attention to presidental politics. Bush, on the other hand, was the bottom 5. http://www.factcheck.org/2010/06/oil-spill-foreign-help-and-the-jones-act/ Q: Did Obama turn down foreign offers of assistance in cleaning up the Gulf oil spill? Did he refuse to waive Jones Act restrictions on foreign-flag vessels? A: No to both questions. So far, offers from six foreign countries or entities have been accepted and only one offer has been rejected. Fifteen foreign-flag vessels are working on the cleanup, and none required a waiver. FULL QUESTION Is it true that Obama blocked foreign help with cleaning up the Gulf oil spill because he refused to waive the Jones Act, which requires all boats to be American made and crewed by Americans to work in U.S. waters, even though it has been routinely waived for similar events? FULL ANSWER We’ve received several questions about the federal government’s response to the oil spill. This one claims that a provision of the Merchant Marine Act , called the Jones Act , has prohibited foreign vessels from entering U.S. waters and assisting in the cleanup. Some critics have charged — falsely — that Obama’s refusal to waive the Jones Act has kept foreign vessels from assisting in cleanup efforts. In a June 23 interview on "Fox & Friends," Republican Rep. Charles Djou of Hawaii was asked by show host Gretchen Carlson about the Jones Act and why the administration was refusing foreign assistance. Djou answered: Djou, June 23: It’s important that we take help from whomever and wherever they’re willing to offer it. … So why are we not waiving the Jones Act to allow international help to come in? … Why we’re not waiving it here … is baffling. Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin and Texas Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison , both Republicans, have also claimed that the Jones Act, which was temporarily lifted by President Bush after Hurricane Katrina, is now standing in the way of foreign vessels bringing assistance to the United States. They are both incorrect. Palin stated this in an interview with Fox News’ Greta Van Susteren: Palin, June 11: For one, there needs to be a waiving of the Jones Act so that we could have had many, many days ago, weeks ago, some help with skimmers from elsewhere, besides just U.S. flagships, come over and help in this tragedy. And that order needs to be given to [Coast Guard] Admiral [Thad] Allen right now. It’s amazing to me and to so many others that though President Bush had been able to waive Jones Act provisions for Katrina, President Obama hasn’t thought to do that yet? And yet surely, that has been suggested by those experts around him. In reality, the Jones Act has yet to be an issue in the response efforts. The Deepwater Horizon response team reported in a June 15 press release that there are 15 foreign flagged ships currently participating in the oil spill cleanup. None of them needed a waiver because the Jones Act does not apply. The Jones Act is a trade and commerce law that was enacted in 1920 as part of a larger Marine Merchant Act. It requires all trade delivered between U.S. ports to be carried in U.S. flagged vessels constructed in the United States and owned by American citizens. The law states its purpose is to develop a merchant marine for national defense and commerce...(MORE) The fact of the matter is this...Whenever there is a crisis, republicans try to use that to attack labor. Look at Katrina and the Davis-Bacon Act. Same thing... |
Obama is secretly Tony Hayward...Coming next... Whatever displeases them, Its Obama's fault. Always Whining. Boo Hoo... |
![]() |
Has Obama done anything right? I mean to help America. He is good at helping Muslims, but that's because he is one. |
All kinds of things, do you want a list. How about a comparative list against what Conservative republicans do in office? |
You just will never understand this will you,,you are blind to the truth of Obama and his socialism for us,,he's useless as a leader and has done nothing but destroy,,live and learn cause if this isn't stopped be prepared to suffer alot.Move to the EU and see life as it will be here .
|
YES list them,,then study socialism and get ready to hand over over 60% of your income to the Muslim savior you worship.Dam are you libs that clueless?You will live and learn now the hard way cause you can't see the trouble right in front of you,idiots you are disgraceful to the USA and should move..Obama wont stay in the USA when he's done with us so follow the leader you fool. |
First off, please look up the definition of "socialism", you are embarrassing yourself and anyone who took freshman civics. Secondly, Are we back to Muslim again? Muslim today, radical christian preacher the next. As I said earlier, pick one and stick with it. Taxes are at their lowest point since the 1950s . "Get ready"? Sorry I don't debate your hypothetical straw-man paranoia. Reality please. Incredible grammar and spelling, your mother must be proud. Meanwhile, keep picking BP over Obama, that is a popular stance for you guys to follow...
|
P.S. your list of Obama successes . in just one year President Obama... Passed Healthcare Reform (ending preexisting conditions, giving small business subsidies for providing insurance, Creating 3.2M HC-related jobs over the next 10 years, closing the medicare donut hole in drug coverage, ensuring coverage for all kids up till the age of 26, covering 32 million americans, expanding medicaid to cover the rest, all while cutting the national debt by a 100 billion dollars) - Check. Signed into law Tax Cuts for all middle income families, and 95% of all Americans - Check Signed an Arms control agreement with Russia to dismantle nuclear weapons - Check Reauthorized SCHIP to cover all Children - Check Saved the entire stock market from collapsing (from a low point of a dow of 6000 within a month of Obama taking office, to close to 11,000 just an year later, basically preventing millions of retirement accounts from getting wiped out) - Check Ended the ban on travel for people with HIV - Check Stopped the dismissals of homosexual individuals serving in the military by the Pentagon (It's the first step to dismantling DA,DT completely) - Check Ended the federal crackdown on Medicinal Marijuana centers in CA - Check Passed into law Mortgage Fraud Protections - Check Ended the ban on Stem Cell Research - Check Passed Student Loan Reform, and Used The Savings to Significantly Increase Financial Aid Loans and Grants - Check Engaged in diplomatic dialogue with Middle Eastern countries, instead of using language like "Axis of Evil" that achieves nothing other than to piss them off some more. - Check Passed Credit Card Reform (Minimizing Predatory Lending, Making the terms of credit cards clear, eliminating arbitrary rate increases) - Check Since the passage of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, have had the new job loss numbers from their peak right as Obama took office, go down steadily month after month, every single month like clockwork to the point that finally, this month is going to have job growth in the six figures (a trend expected to accelerate this whole year) - Check Reversed the ban on sending foreign aid to countries with legal abortions (The Mexico City Policy) - Check Signed the Expanded Hate Crimes Bill - Check Helped stem down employment discrimination by passing the Lilly Ledbetter Act - Check Extended Unemployment Benefit, helping millions of Americans stave off bankrupcy until the economy recovers - Check Drew down troops in Iraq for a 2011 withdrawl date - Check Drew down Gitmo detainees and making prepartations to close it by 2011 - Check Increased the forces in Afganistan and brought to justice 500+ major Al Queda senior leaders in the past year (more than the Bush Administration brought in all eight years combined) - Check Saved the entire US Auto Industry (GM and Chrysler) from going bankrupt thus preventing dozens of major factories and hundreds of dealerships from closing their doors - Check Saved banks from going bankrupt to the point that they're profitable again and have now paid back all of government loans and bailout funds in full and with interest - Check Signed into law, new mileage and emissions standard for cars and suvs - Check...(MORE IN LINK) |
![]() |
I don't agree that this is a list of good things accomplished. I hope most are reversed in the next administration. |
It seems to me that everyone wants the power to go to the people, but when something goes wrong, they demand that the Government step in with more regulation. Regulation transfers the power from the people to the Government. Once the Government takes possession of that power they never give it up. They only tighten their grip, that is, until they can use their leverage over large corporations to their own political advantage. This practice has been proven to exist to a large degree on both sides of the isle. Little or no regulation allows industry to flourish, but at the expense of the victims of the accidents that are bound to occur when regulation is non-existent. Question is, what in history is more responsible for the mass murder of a countries population, a greedy out of control oil company, or a power hungry, control all Government? We are at the point now where we are no longer trying to figure out how much regulation is enough or too much, we are in a battle with extreme ideologies giving it their all. The days of the moderate are gone forever. The right sees compromise as defeat, and the left has it's sights set on a complete transformation from Capitalism to Socialism. When our dear old Grandpa proudly declared his allegiance to the Democratic party, little did he know that his hero FDR, was actually the biggest Communist to ever set foot on American soil. By making a crises twice as bad as need be, he was able to make Government appear to have the power to solve all problems, large and small. Now we have Obama using that same model to finish what FDR started some seventy years ago, only now, people are more informed than Grandpa was then. I'm not saying that Grandpa was stupid, I'm just saying that we have more sources of information now. We are not limited to our wanna-be dictator's radio broadcasts as our only source of information. The right is just as broken as the left. Slowly but surely, political correctness has been allowed to seep in through the cracks, and this infestation of false guilt has led many Republicans to wander around lost without a political identity. They have wrongly been called a hater, a racist, a cold hearted SOB, and they have been made to feel guilty because of their ability to succeed. In other words, the Republican party was blending in with the Democratic party. Republicans have been trying to Govern using Progressive ideas and policies. Republicans have jumped on the big spending bandwagon and now the Democrats are pointing out how flawed Republican policies have been in recent years. What they don't point out is, the policies they blame Bush for are the same policies Progressives have been pushing for decades. We find ourselves in a period of time where everyone is seeking out their own identity. Everyone on the right is going far right. No compromise, no moderation, and no more false guilt. Those on the left are lost. The small number of people still defending Obama's every move are the die-hard transformationalists. They refer to themselves as Communists, but only when discussing policies among themselves. In public however, the keep their intentions hidden, always diverting the attention away from their own radical intentions by demonizing everything traditionally American. The rest of the Democratic party is either still uninformed and waiting for another Clinton to emerge, or they have relabeled themselves as Independents. The line in the sand has been drawn. Hard right, and hard left. No more center anything. The only ones willing to compromise are the Independents, because they will have to decide which radical team to put their support behind. One thing is obvious, they are running away from this administration. After reading the comments above, I have to say that Obama is doing all of the above. He is slow in his response to the oil spill because he wants it to be worse than it is, so he can demonize oil and push through Cap and Trade legislation. He put BP in charge, because he has neither the will, or the ability to handle a crises situation, and he needs to have someone to blame at election time. I'm not going to say that the spill itself was intentional, nor will I blame it on Bush's cronyism, or Obama's equally corrupt involvement, but I will say that this administration has openly shown their willingness to take advantage of a crises. Not unlike Obama's heroes and mentors of the past hundred years. Both public figures and personal friends alike. If we make a list of Obama's actions to date and try to give him a grade, the grade generated would, and could, only come from the heart of the one doing the grading. If you are a true Communist and you believe in total Government control of everything, then you will give Obama an A+, then you will proceed to place his portrait on your wall alongside that Of Stalin and Castro. If you believe in the Constitution, personal responsibility, and fighting wars to win them, you will give Obama an F, then burn his portrait by coating it with fresh crude taken straight from your favorite gulf beach. Every beach party needs a campfire, and every civilization needs to be challenged in order to return to it's roots. Obama is that challenge, and America will once again find her roots. |




Email
Print Article
Favorites
Report Abuse











(it's on the right side, above 

