Welcome to Blogster!
89,556 Blogster Users  |  364,642 Posts
 
 
 

AngryRepublican

 

Blog Traffic: 86026

Posts: 692

My Comments: 4073

User Comments: 8882

Photos: 4

Friends: 129

Following: 0

Followers: 36

Points: 11334

Last Online: 15 hours ago


 
 

Friends


 

 

 

 

 
 
 

Recent Viewers


 

 

 

 

 
 

American JOBS- Adams, Jefferson, Hamilton, tell us what to do?

Added: Saturday, December 5th 2009 at 8:19pm by AngryRepublican
Related Tags: politics
 
 
 

American JOBS- Adams, Jefferson, Hamilton, tell us what to do..??

Photobucket

We Americans got some good news recently, as the unemployment figures DROPPED from 10.2 %- to 10%.

I remain skeptical though, because in the business that I am in, I know this may only be temporary.

Yes, I saw a lot of new people being trained for new jobs. However, I know that come January and February, many of these “new faces” will be gone.

They are commonly called: Seasonal employees, who are picked up for the Christmas shopping season. Only a few, who show drive and determination, will remain in that job after the holidays.

Still, it is good news because the unemployment figures could have gotten worse.

Can we live with 10% unemployment..??

Can we live with one out of every ten people in America out of work..??


And let’s not forget, how many people are “under-employed”? How many people are working a job that they are vastly over- qualified for, but they settle for what they have because there is nothing else out there?

I still believe that JOBS and the economy are the most important issue that we face today. Hence, we march forward with our editorial series on JOBS.

We need to return “industry” back to America. We do not “make” anything, anymore.

When trying to find a solution to the economic problems that we face today, the debate usually unfolds like this:

(Here is an example debate between the liberal progressive and the conservative:)

“It was those dam democrats: Barney Frank and Chris Dodd who caused this crisis. They were in charge of banking.”

“Oh, yea; what about President Bush and the republicans? They were in charge of the government for 6 years and did nothing.”

Is that so, well it was the democrats during Carter and Clinton that PUT people in houses that they couldn’t afford.”

“Really, well it was Reaganomics that de-regulated everything and caused this crisis because banks went nuts giving out crappy loans that hurt people.”

“You suck, it was Carter who set the country on this socialistic path and taxes are so high that people cannot pay their bills.”

“You idiot, it was Nixon who...”

At this point, if you folks would like to go get a sandwich and maybe a beverage, you have plenty of time. I guaranty that this fight will still be taking place when you return.

Might I suggest an ice cold soda pop and a baloney sandwich?

Sounds tasty..!!

OK, let’s rejoin this debate between the liberal and the conservative, on what caused the current bad economy.

“You perverted fool, it was Jefferson who taxed people so that he could beef up his Navy.”

“Don’t call me a perverted fool you sick bastard, it was Adams who couldn’t decide if he was for a bigger government or a smaller one.”

“Oh, yea; well it was George Washington who...”


OK, let’s leave this debate between the liberal and the conservative. (You get the point.)

BOTH political party’s had a fair share in causing this economic crisis that we are in today.


Photobucket

And it will take both: conservatives and liberals to fix it.

In my last editorial on JOBS, we talked about the only solution that we can use to bring jobs back to America is with (taxes) tariffs.

We do not want to work for lower pay like in China, India, or Mexico.

We could relax environmental laws somewhat, but we do not want to pollute the air and water.

However, if we remove all taxes from products that are “truly” made in America, while raising “tariffs” on all imports; we could bring industry back to America.

One stumbling block to tariffs is the belief that:

“You cannot mess with the free market. If government screws with capitalism, we are doomed to fail as a nation.”

Well, that might not necessarily be true. Let’s start at the beginning.

American JOBS- Adams, Jefferson, Hamilton; tell us what to do?

Photobucket

From the beginning, the Colonies in the New World were supplied by European ships carrying goods from foreign lands.

Sure, we built our own houses and grew our own food; but we imported most other things. (Clothing material, iron works, mechanical devices, etc.)

It was apparent after the Revolutionary War, that America NEEDED it’s own industry.

Joined together in the fight for freedom; Jefferson, Adams, and Hamilton were united. After the war, they could agree on little.

Jefferson wanted a smaller federal government with powerful “states rights” and personal freedom.

Hamilton wanted a larger federal government with “laws and order” and a powerful Navy.

Adams was stuck somewhere in between and spent his time trying to hold America together by appeasing both sides.

George Washington didn’t belong to any political party and after the Revolutionary War, Washington just wanted to go home and do some fishing. (Smart guy..!!)

One thing that all these men could agree on was that the federal government would have to raise money. But how..??

The founding fathers knew that they couldn’t impose personal taxes, they had just fought a war to get away from that. Yet, they knew that the federal government could not survive by charity. (Politicians working for free, states- banding together to donate materials and labor to build Navy ships, etc.)

Being resourceful, the founding fathers always looked for ways to solve two problems with one solution. And America had 3 BIG problems to solve:

(One) The federal government needed funds

(Two) America needed industry. We didn’t “make” many things in America. (Sound familiar..??)

(Three) The Southern States had “slave” labor. How could any Northern business compete with Southern States that had very low labor costs? (Also, very familiar with our situation today. Low labor costs of goods made in China, Mexico, etc.)

The founding fathers solution was ingenious and simple:

Tax (tariff) all goods that arrive by ship.

This solution solved all three problems.

The federal government received the money it needed to survive. Yet, it didn’t tax individual Americans, personally.

The tax was high enough that it forced some European companies to move to America and set up shop. Also, enterprising Americans ventured into business on their own.

And, the South couldn’t bombard the North with cheap goods made from slave labor because these goods arrived up North, from the South, by ship; thereby receiving the shipping tariff. (It was almost impossible to ship large amounts of goods over land in those days.)

The tariff was the solution that solved our problems in those early days. The tariff ranged from a low 5%, all the way up to a high of 50%, in 1828.

You could almost tell who controlled congress by how high the tariff was.

When southern democrats (“Democrat- Republicans” as they were called back then) controlled the congress, they would lower the tariff to “help the southern states compete in the global market.”

When a northern member of the “Whig Party” controlled congress, the tariff would rise to “protect northern states from unfair advantages that ‘other’ countries have over America.”

The tariff fluctuated like that until President Lincoln and the abolishment of slavery. Now, the south didn’t have an unfair labor advantage. President Lincoln had to impose a 49% tariff to fund the Civil War. After the Civil War, with the south no longer demanding the lower tariff, the tariff remained high.

With this HIGH “protection tariff” in place, American industry became one of the best in the world.

By the 1900's, the British newspaper: “The Daily Mail”, declared: “We have lost to the American manufacturer. (We have lost) electrical machinery, locomotives, steel rails, and agriculture machinery, the pride and backbone of the British engineering industry.”

America had become an industrial giant.

However, greed has a way of poking it’s ugly head into our lives.

American politicians (and large companies) began to believe that if America lowered it’s tariff, (and other countries lowered theirs) American manufacturers could make EVEN MORE MONEY selling goods overseas.

Enter- The era of Free Trade and low Tariffs

President Woodrow Wilson believed in low tariffs. With the advent of the “income tax”, the federal government no longer needed a high tariff to run the country. Income tax provided the government with plenty of money.

America experienced a great industrial boom.

This is where, (I believe) the notion was formed that: “trade MUST be free from tariffs, for American industry to grow”.

It is important to remember that Europe went through WW1. The “Old World’s” industry was devastated from this war. American goods would have been bought by foreign nations REGARDLESS of the tariff rate. Other nations had little choice. WW1 and WW2 crippled these nations.

Now, I’m NOT saying that
we should have taxed “the crap” out of people who were suffering. I’m saying that “Free Trade” wasn’t the only catalyst for our economic growth.

None the less- free trade, low tariffs, and world trade policies became the normal for democrats and republicans alike.

Enter- globalization, the new world order, and “It’s a small world after all.”

America chugged along pretty good after WW2. That is, until...

American labor unions demanded HIGHER pay for it’s workers.

Americans demanded cleaner air, clearer water.

We wanted safer jobs.

And WHY NOT..!!

(We deserve it.) We work hard..!!


And, from the safety of our front porches, we all watched as the textile industry left American shores. We do not make clothing material here, anymore.

We all watched as the steel industry left America, and set up shop in some foreign land.

We all laughed at the first Japanese made TV sets. They were made with plastic shells. “Who would buy one ..??”, we said. American made television sets were framed in wood. They were BIG, heavy, scary looking things and it took four guys to move one. Today, you cannot find an American made TV.

We scratched our heads when we saw the first “small” foreign cars zipping by on American highways. Today, foreign cars make up nearly 45% of the vehicles sold in America.

We do not “make” anything, anymore.

We sell things. We service things.

But we do not make anything, anymore.

Some argue that “free markets” are what built America.

Others debate that “protectionism” allowed America to become strong.

I argue that it was a delicate balance between the two, that made America strong.

Protectionism of the 1800's allowed American industry to become strong and excel in the “free markets” of the 1900's.

The key is knowing when to “protect” and when to “free” the markets.


If ever there was a time to protect our industry, it is the present.

We need to learn from the founding fathers, for they went through the same thing that we are experiencing today.

We need to lower or remove all federal, state, and local taxes from anything “made” in America. And raise taxes on all imported goods. This will force industry back to America.

It worked for the founding fathers. There is no reason why it will not work again, today.


Written by AR Babonie for The Angry Republic

This concludes our 4th editorial on American JOBS. If you are interested in this topic and you missed the first 3 parts, I have links below.

The next editorial on American JOBS will deal with the next level of business for returning jobs to America.

We know what the problem is, we have a solution, and we have looked at the constitutionality of this solution. (Hell, the founding fathers did it, so it MUST be legal.)


Photobucket

Next, we need to start to implement this solution. I will need your help and your impute. We need to find politicians who also believe that American JOBS are the most important issue of the day.

I do not care if this politician is an independent, republican, or democrat. The issue of American JOBS rises above political parties.

If we cannot find a politician who supports the issue of American JOBS, then we will create one. (After all, these politicians work for us.)

But, that is for our next editorial, called:

American JOBS part 5- Taking the First Step

Photobucket

Past editorials on American JOBS

American JOBS part 1- What went wrong


American JOBS part 2- Safety First


American JOBS part 3- The Solution


American JOBS part 4- Adams, Jefferson, Hamilton, tell us what to do

(You just read that one)


American JOBS part 5- Taking the First Step

(Due out in a couple of weeks)

Photobucket

Thanks for reading

The Angry Republic

Photobucket

User Comments

the reality is that the number of NEW people becoming unemployed has slowed because we are running out of people to fire. The number of people needed to run the country is our "break even point" at which we can't fire anymore people. The closer we get to that break even point, the fewer people there are to fire so of course, the number of people losing their jobs falls. For example, the more private sector people lose their jobs the more welfare workers will be needed. The number of real estate agents needed has dropped but the number of rental property managers has gone up. We had to close our mechanic shop but my husband found a job in a parts place IE poorer people do more of their own repairs. What we want to see is the number of people being hired into what we can call "luxury item jobs". Look for ads for NEW car sales, real estate SALES agents, casino HOTEL workers (dealers represent despwerate people trying to make income). Thats why the lower unemployment rate didnt feel right to you. Its a skewed stat.

Thanks for the comment..!!

I kind of figured that the current unemployment figures were not a good indicator. I guess I was trying to be up-beat because they could have been worse.

Great post and we need to make America more than the King of the service industry. As an ex Union employee in my early years I told the man that wanted to groom me for a Local office position that the Unions would be the death of American jobs. In some respects is has been. There was a time in history when they were very important to the labor forces, now they are costing them.

Thanks,

I agree with you on unions. They were essential in our history. Today, that might do more damage.

I am always reminded of a true story about unions. A company in Ohio, called: “Delphi” (they make auto parts), their workers union FOUGHT long and fought hard to get their members LOWER pay.

(Yes, the union fought to get workers less money per hour.)

Delphi was going to lay off 50 employees. The union said: No you will not, we will strike. Delphi said: Go ahead a strike and we will close the plant, we cannot run it anymore, it is losing money.

So, the union fought to give everyone lower pay so that no one got laid off. Pay raises were frozen for years.

Delphi was going to lay-off 50: non-productive people who call off sick all the time. People who do not care about their jobs, and new employees who hadn’t settled in yet.

Instead, the union fought to keep those people working, and everyone has to make less money. Even people who have spent decades working for Delphi.

Makes no sense to me.

Thanks for the comment, Rutroh..!!

I like to listen to John Stossel on this subject... too bad you weren't at the WH jobs summit.... only 10% of the current administration is founded in business.... and the fact that he really only had big corporations there makes me doubt any real good will come from it... The Unemployment stat is skewed... the real unemployment needs to be faced and not covered up.

Thanks Bliss,

I have been searching the news but I do not see any solutions coming from the “Job Summit.”

Did they provide beer..??

(Hey, it worked for President Obama with the Cop and the College Professor.)

The Chamber of Commerce was not the only major business organization left off the White House jobs-summit guest list. The National Federation of Independent Business and the National Association of Manufacturers were not included, either.

I'm a trucker and a Teamster. I used to argue with my best friend all the time about unions. He always said it was my one "blind spot" when it came to being a Republican. (back when I WAS a Republican) I've worked at non-union companies and now I'm a Teamster. Its good to be a Teamster on one hand because the boss can't just fire you if he deciedes he doesn't like the way ya comb your hair. It sucks to be a Teamster because the company can't get rid of dead weight. Some of the guys where I work are putting us out of business because they won't do any more than the minimum...also some of them have the entitlement mentality. Sometimes being a Teamster these days makes me feel slimy and knowing MY money went to help elect this current bunch of morons is almost more than I can take.

That’s another bad thing about a union: regardless if you are an independent or a republican, you know that your union dues are going to the democrat party. Millions of dollars every year.

There is no doubt that unions helped people, and still do today. But unions can hurt the company, and if the company leaves America, we are all screwed.

Unions would serve their people better by cutting the dues in half, and stop the practice of giving money to political party.

Thanks, JMO..!!

The whole nation of Sweden functions like a union... I only knew a few small businesses and from idea to running they would not grow bigger than what family members could manage... they did not want to have to hire out of the family because of poor quality employees that more than likely would turn into deed weight it is very hard to fire anyone once hired. 

One more story i want to share. Our neighbors in Sweden had a forest they worked but to have cash flow they ran a taxi company. The parents and one daughter each drove a car. The Government mandates 6 weeks of vacation. Nice huh. But they dreaded it every year. One they could alternate their vacations off and drive only 2 cars, but they found it very stressful being able to meet their regular clients needs, so then they just started all parking the taxi's for the 6 weeks and having the time off, but no money.... they had to prove they complied so there was no way to fudge it... they loved the time off, but said it was very hard for them to get ahead financially Eric the dad would always start binge drinking  .. . it would suck the savings out of them and the mom would tell me the domestic violence increased  . . .

Other little businesses would post signs they would also be closing from this date till that date... it was weird... and if they had something you had been eye balling for some time.. you just had to wait the 6 weeks. 

CRAZY!!!

That is crazy.

Doesn't much of France close down in August because everyone has a month off?

And your comment before, I guess workers can close a shop in Europe because it is dam near impossable for a person to get fired. You have to steal, or stab your boss with a knife to get fired.

Even if your employee called off sick and headed to the pub to drink beer, you couldn't fire them. They could claim that they are depressed and that is why they are drinking. One stop at the FREE health clinic with a doctor's note saying "yes, they are depressed" and you cannot fire them.

Sadly, we are on this path.

I remember hearing that members of congress were debating forcing American companies to give PAID time off from work to anyone who "thought" that they had swine flu.

I can see every employee claiming that they got the "pig flu" on New Years Eve {#drinking08.gif}

nothing good came from the Job summit because the people who employ just over half of americans- small businesses - were apparently not invited. Just like small businesses were left out of the stimulus ideas. Thats why we are still in a recession. My family is from Micghigan so I can relate to Union problems. There is good and bad with Unions but when the UAW donated millions to Hurricane Katrina victims, knowing we are all non-union, welll, I just have to be kind to them. We dont have unions here because we dont need them. If you dont like your job you quit and have another job paying the same or better within a week or two. What good is a union to us?

Very interresting.  Wilson is considered by many as the father of modern progressives.

I await your next blog.  It would seen that many things you suggest would be affected by treaties.  NAFTA, like it of not, is a treaty.  You would need the "right" people in congress and a POTUS who walks a different path than the one we have.

I have wanted to do a post on President Wilson because I do believe that he is the father of the progressive movement in America.

But then I think to myself: “Why would I want to promote the progressive movement? Let some liberal / progressive study the beginnings of this movement.”

As you have said, it would take a congress that has a totally different belief in the current American trade system. That mountain seems VERY high to climb.

However, we can dismiss many of these treaties (NAFTA, CAFTA, etc) under the premise of “National Security.” (Which, goes back to my second editorial: “American JOBS- Safety First.”)

As you mention; the BIG step is getting a congress that believes in promoting jobs here in America.

I hope to have a solution for that, albeit somewhat: half-assed, in the editorial called: “American JOBS- Taking the first step.”

Thanks, Intrudermarine..!!

Thanks.  Some say Teddy Roosevelt was the first progressive.  Nah.  It's been around since Adams, but very mild.  Wilson is the father.  I was going to do a blog on Wilson, but I would be writing until who knows when. 

Post A Comment